Skip navigation

Tag Archives: Posting From Others


China’s Export Tsunami Could Rewrite Global Trade Before Trump-Xi Showdown

Khac Phu Nguyen

Tue, September 23, 2025 at 7:43 AM CDT·2 min read

12

This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Chinese exporters have refused to blink in the face of President Trump’s tariffs that reached as high as 145%. Instead, Beijing’s manufacturing base has redirected output with surprising force: India recorded an all-time high for purchases in August, shipments to Africa are on track for a record year, and sales to Southeast Asia have surpassed their pandemic-era levels. Analysts note that the pivot is propelling China toward a possible $1.2 trillion trade surplus, even though profits at industrial firms slipped 1.7% in the first seven months. The volume surge is keeping factories humming, but the reliance on price cuts is intensifying deflationary pressure at home.

Advertisement

The global reaction has been cautious but watchful. Mexico has floated tariffs as steep as 50% on Chinese cars, auto parts, and steel, while India has received dozens of requests to probe dumping practices. Indonesia’s trade ministry stepped in after viral clips showed Chinese sellers offering jeans for under $1, sparking outrage among local producers. Yet, many governments appear reluctant to escalate tensions with Beijing while already engaged in tariff negotiations with Washington. Some, such as South Africa, have favored fresh investment over penalties, while others in Latin America, including Chile and Ecuador, have quietly imposed targeted fees. Brazil, despite earlier threats, granted BYD (BYDDF) a tariff-free window to ramp up production, illustrating how Beijing’s blend of diplomacy and economic leverage is shaping outcomes.

For markets, the strategic landscape remains fluid. Trump has been pressing NATO allies to consider tariffs of up to 100% on Chinese goods, while Xi has urged BRICS nations to unite against protectionism. A weaker yuan and the Fed’s latest rate cut have also sharpened China’s export edge. Electric vehicle shipments valued at over $19 billion have held steady against last year’s pace, and Apple’s pivot to India has paradoxically lifted Chinese parts exports. Analysts suggest China could continue shifting goods toward Europe, Australia, and BRICS partners, limiting the fallout from lost US orders. All of this builds toward a high-stakes Trump-Xi summit in South Korea, where a fragile 90-day tariff truce may define the next stage of the trade confrontation. View comments (12)

Up next

Tariffs hit China’s tech trade in America, but the rest of the world kept buying

Huileng Tan

Mon, September 22, 2025 at 9:28 AM CDT·2 min read

7

  • China’s tech exports to the US have fallen 70% since the fourth quarter due to President Trump’s tariffs.
  • Other Asian countries, like South Korea and Vietnam, are exporting much more to the US.
  • Global demand for AI products remains strong, boosting Asia’s tech exports overall.

China’s tech exports to the US have cratered, but demand from the rest of the world is keeping the East Asian giant’s trade machine humming.

In August, Chinese shipments of tech products to the US plunged 70% compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, according to a Goldman Sachs analysis published Sunday.

The collapse followed the rollout of President Donald Trump’s new tariffs, including a 20% “fentanyl tariff” on all Chinese imports that took effect in March.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, other Asian economies filled the gap. From the fourth quarter through August, tech exports to the US from countries like South Korea, Vietnam, and India jumped 80%, according to Goldman.

Outside the US, Chinese tech exports didn’t suffer the same fate. Demand in Europe, Asia, and emerging markets kept growing.

“Tech exports to non-US destinations showed little difference between China and the rest of Asia, with tech exports from both performing similarly well compared to other sectors,” wrote Goldman’s analysts.

In July, China and the rest of Asia’s tech exports to non-US markets rose about 20% relative to the fourth quarter of 2024, “reflecting strength in global tech demand,” Goldman’s analysts wrote.

The tariffs underscore how Washington’s trade war is reshaping supply chains and driving high-tech decoupling with China.

Advertisement

But the divergence also reflects a bigger trend: a steady reordering of tech supply chains that accelerated during the pandemic and has been reinforced by Washington’s trade policies.

In 2017, nearly half of the US’s critical tech imports came directly from China. By 2025, that figure has fallen below 20%, Goldman estimated.

Taiwan, Mexico, Japan, India, and Vietnam have gained market share in the process.

Asia AI exports boom

Despite the pressure on China, Asia is thriving in the AI-fueled export boom.

Overall exports from the region rose 7% in dollar terms through August compared to a year earlier, Goldman said. Technology products accounted for more than 60% of those gains.

Taiwan has been the breakout winner, with over 70% of its exports coming from tech — the highest share in Asia.

In August, Taiwan’s exports surged 30% from the fourth quarter of 2024, powered by advanced chips and servers that are critical for AI data centers.

Advertisement

Goldman’s analysts wrote that they expect the reshuffling to continue.

Tech supply chains will likely continue to shift, further driving high-tech decoupling between the US and China and reconfiguring of Asia’s trade within and outside the region,” they wrote.

Read the original article on Business Insider View comments (7)

Up next

Hardest-hit Vietnam risks losing $25 billion from US tariffs, UN estimates

Francesco Guarascio

Sun, September 21, 2025 at 10:59 PM CDT·3 min read

70

A container is loaded onto a cargo ship while docked at Hai Phong port in Vietnam

By Francesco Guarascio

HANOI (Reuters) -U.S. tariffs imposed in August risk slashing up to one-fifth of Vietnam’s exports to the United States, making it the worst-hit country in Southeast Asia, according to estimates by the United Nations Development Programme.

Vietnam was the world’s sixth-largest exporter to America last year with $136.5 billion worth of shipped goods, U.S. trade data show. Those goods are largely produced in factories run by U.S. and foreign multinational companies or their suppliers.

In a worst-case scenario of very high tariff-driven U.S. inflation, the 20% duties levied on Vietnamese goods could cause its U.S. exports to fall “over time by more than 25 billion dollars, nearly one fifth of the yearly total,” Philip Schellekens, UNDP chief economist for the Asia-Pacific region, told Reuters.

Advertisement

Vietnam’s finance and industry ministries did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

The first comprehensive Vietnamese data released since tariffs took effect on August 7 show Vietnam’s exports to the United States, its biggest market, fell by 2% in August from July, with a 5.5% drop for footwear, of which Vietnam is the world’s second-largest supplier, according to the customs department. That followed a surge in exports before tariffs.

The World Bank revised down Vietnam’s growth forecasts for this year after the U.S. tariffs took effect.

Nike, Adidas and Puma, which produce a large part of their global output of shoes through suppliers in Vietnam, declined to comment.

VIETNAM HIT HARDEST

The 19.2% potential fall in Vietnamese exports to America would be nearly twice as high as the average 9.7% possible drop in exports from Southeast Asia, the most impacted region in the continent and a major industrial hub, according to a UNDP report released last week, one of the first public estimates of the hit on trade flows since the tariffs took effect.

Advertisement

“No country in Southeast Asia is more exposed to U.S. tariff hikes than Vietnam,” said Schellekens, noting only China in East Asia would be hit harder in dollar terms.

Among large Southeast Asian nations, Thailand’s U.S. exports could fall 12.7%, Malaysia’s 10.4% and Indonesia’s 6.4%, the UNDP report said.

The estimated fall of U.S. exports would shave roughly 5% from Vietnam’s Gross Domestic Product, although the tariff impact could take years to fully materialise, and was likely to be mitigated by exporters’ absorption of some costs, Vietnam’s diversification to other regions and bigger domestic spending.

The UNDP estimates are based on a scenario in which duties would be entirely passed through to U.S. consumers, damping demand, which so far has not happened as the impact on U.S. inflation has been moderate.

The UNDP did not take into account either the possible effect of 40% tariffs on goods transhipped through Vietnam, which could have a devastating impact if Washington decided to set strict limits on foreign components used in exported items, given Vietnam’s goods highly rely on Chinese input.

Advertisement

The UNDP data did not factor in current tariff exemptions on consumer electronics which account for about 28% of Vietnam’s total exports to America. However, even if Washington upheld those waivers, Vietnam’s U.S. exports could still fall by $18 billion, Schellekens said.

(Reporting by Francesco Guarascio; Additional reporting by Khanh Vu; Editing by Stephen Coates) View comments (70)

Up next

Over 70% of H-1B visa holders are Indian citizens. Its government says Trump jacking the fee to $100,000 is ‘likely to have humanitarian consequences’

Dave Smith

Mon, September 22, 2025 at 8:54 AM CDT·4 min read

1.9k

President Donald Trump speaks before signing executive orders in the Oval Office at the White House on September 19, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump signed two executive orders, establishing the “Trump Gold Card” and introducing a $100,000 fee for H-1B visas.

India’s Ministry of External Affairs issued a response Saturday to President Donald Trump’s decision to impose a $100,000 fee on H-1B visa applications, warning on X that the move could create “humanitarian consequences” by disrupting families, calling for the United States to address these concerns.

The statement came after Trump signed a proclamation Friday imposing the hefty new fee on skilled worker visas, which went into effect on Sunday. The policy represents one of the most dramatic overhauls of the H-1B program in decades, targeting a visa category heavily relied upon by Indian professionals working in America’s technology sector.

“This measure is likely to have humanitarian consequences by way of the disruption caused for families,” the ministry said in its official statement. “Government hopes that these disruptions can be addressed suitably by the US authorities.”

The proclamation sparked immediate chaos across Indian communities and the global tech industry, with thousands of H-1B visa holders scrambling to return to the United States before the new rules took effect. At San Francisco International Airport, The Independent reports that several Indian passengers disembarked from an Emirates flight just minutes before takeoff, because they feared being unable to return to the U.S. under the new policy. A three-hour delay ensued.

India has particular reason for concern about the policy changes: According to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Indian nationals account for 71% of H-1B visa recipients, making them by far the largest beneficiary group. Chinese nationals represent the second-largest group at approximately 12%. The dominance is even more pronounced in technology roles, where over 80% of computer-related H-1B positions are filled by Indian workers.

The new fee structure represents a staggering increase from current H-1B application costs, which range from approximately $1,700 to $4,500. The Trump administration defended the move as necessary to address “systemic abuse” of the H-1B program and protect American workers.

Major U.S. technology companies moved quickly to reassure employees after initial confusion about the policy’s scope. Reuters reports that AmazonMicrosoftMetaApple, and Google—all heavy users of the H-1B program—issued urgent advisories clarifying the $100,000 fee applies only to new visa petitions, not existing holders or renewals. The White House later confirmed that current H-1B visa holders can continue to travel in and out of the United States as before.

According to federal data, Amazon currently has the highest number of H-1B visa holders at over 10,000, followed by Indian IT giant Tata Consultancy Services, with approximately 5,500. Other major beneficiaries include Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and Google, each with over 4,000 H-1B visa holders. But Alan Patricof, the private-equity investor and founder of Greycroft Partners, told the NYT, “there is not a single company that I have invested in the last 10 years that could afford to pay this.”

The policy comes amid broader tensions in U.S.-India relations following Trump’s imposition of punitive tariffs on Indian exports earlier this year. The president implemented a 25% “reciprocal” tariff on Indian goods, followed by an additional 25% penalty tied to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil, shocking Indian counterparties and bringing total duties to 50%.

India’s commerce minister Piyush Goyal is scheduled to visit Washington on Monday for trade talks, highlighting ongoing efforts to reset the relationship between the two nations. The timing of the H-1B announcement just days before these crucial negotiations adds another layer of complexity to the diplomatic discussions.

In its statement, India’s foreign ministry emphasized the mutual benefits of skilled talent mobility between the two countries. “Skilled talent mobility and exchanges have contributed enormously to technology development, innovation, economic growth, competitiveness and wealth creation in the United States and India,” the ministry said. “Policy makers will therefore assess recent steps taking into account mutual benefits, which include strong people-to-people ties between the two countries.”

The ministry also noted that Indian industry has begun analyzing the full implications of the policy changes and is expected to work with U.S. counterparts on finding solutions. India’s National Association of Software and Service Companies warned the abrupt implementation timeline could have “ripple effects on America’s innovation ecosystem and the wider job economy.”

For Indian IT services companies, the financial impact could be substantial. According to the Times of India, firms like TCS, Infosys, HCL Technologies, and Wipro could see their operating profits reduced by 7%-15% due to the new fees.

The proclamation is set to remain in effect for 12 months unless extended, and legal challenges are expected. The policy also directs the Department of Labor to raise wage requirements for H-1B workers and signals additional reforms to prioritize higher-paid, higher-skilled applications in the visa lottery system.


Associated Press

Gop On The verge of doing something right?

KEVIN FREKING and LISA MASCARO

Updated Fri, December 12, 2025

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate failed to get anywhere on the health care issue this week. Now it’s the House’s turn to show what it can do.

Speaker Mike Johnson unveiled a Republican alternative late Friday, a last-minute sprint as his party refuses to extend the enhanced tax subsidies for those who buy policies through the Affordable Care Act, also called Obamacare, which are expiring at the end of the year. Those subsidies help lower the cost of coverage.

Johnson, R-La., huddled behind closed doors in the morning — as he did days earlier this week — working to assemble the package for consideration as the House focuses the final days of its 2025 work on health care.

“House Republicans are tackling the real drivers of health care costs to provide affordable care,” Johnson said in a statement announcing the package. He said it would be voted on next week.

Time is running out for Congress to act. Democrats engineered the longest federal government shutdown ever this fall in a failed effort to force Republicans to the negotiating table on health care. But after promising votes, the Senate failed this week to advance both a Republican health care plan and the Democratic-offered bill to extend the tax credits for three years.

Now, with just days to go, Congress is about to wrap up its work with no consensus solution in sight.

What Republicans are proposing

The House Republicans offered a 100-plus page package that focuses on long-sought GOP proposals to enhance access to employer-sponsored health insurance plans and clamp down on so-called pharmacy benefit managers.

Republicans propose expanding access to what’s referred to as association health plans, which would allow more small businesses and self-employed individuals to band together and purchase health coverage.

Proponents say such plans increase the leverage businesses have to negotiate a lower rate. But critics say the plans provide skimpier coverage than what is required under the Affordable Care Act.

The Republicans’ proposal would also require more data from pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, as a way to help control drug costs. Critics say PBMs have padded their bottom line and made it more difficult for independent pharmacists to survive.

Comment from provider: After 10 years the GOP is finally thinking about their constituents, this is a sad state when the leadership is too afraid of a “child” to take care of their constituents who should always take precedent! MA


From Michael’s Six word memoirs

Administration: incompetence from top to bottom!

It is horrific to see this country’s leadership headed by possibly the most historically corrupt and incompetent official since the founding of the country.

10 years plus is enough time

The GOP long opposition to the ACA (Obamacare) continues, instead of crafting “something better” the GOP has continued place roadblocks and restrictions in its implementation. (bear in mind that the GOP took the “better” parts of the healthcare bill and added to their own healthcare plans. Now we are still fighting the same fight and affecting the health of millions of Americans even down to many being unable to afford basic healthcare. The Congressional GOP members appear to being ignoring their own constituents’ dilemma along with everyone else’s.



An Indiana Republican state senator announced Nov. 28 that he will vote against the state’s redistricting following President Donald Trump’s use of a slur in a Thanksgiving social media post.

Trump’s Nov. 27 Truth Social post ‒ one in a series of anti-immigrant comments posted Thursday ‒ referred to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as the “r-word.” Though the word was formerly used in medical contexts, it’s now widely regarded as offensive, and disability advocates seek to end its use.

“Those of you that don’t know me or my family might not know that my daughter has Down Syndrome,” state Sen. Mike Bohacek, R-Michiana Shores, wrote on Facebook. “This is not the first time our president has used these insulting and derogatory references and his choices of words have consequences.”

Trump has pushed for several states, including Indiana, to redraw congressional maps to create more safe Republican districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.


Conshea Brown

Sat, November 29, 2025 at 6:16 AM CST

5 min read

As I grow older, I’ve definitely realized that there are plenty of things that never really bothered me when I was younger that now absolutely affect me.

Person with glasses concentrating at a desk, holding their temples, possibly in deep thought or experiencing stress
Jacob Wackerhausen / Getty Images

So when Reddit user u/istrx13 asked the question, “What are you starting to like less and less as you get older?” in r/AskReddit, I knew the responses would definitely hit home:

1. “Driving. I used to be eager to go drive somewhere when I first got my license, but now, it’s like, ‘Meh.’ I’m not scared of driving, but it’s just not enjoyable like it was. It’s just a means of transportation.”

A woman in a car holds a water bottle to her forehead, appearing tired or overheated, while looking out the window
Drazen Zigic / Getty Images

u/not_a_expert69

Related: 38 Photos That Went From Totally Normal To Borderline Disturbing Given What We Know Now

2. “Subscriptions. For. Every. Damn. Thing.”

u/ClimateSad6559

3. “Sweet things. Don’t get me wrong, there are some things that will never get old for me; I love desserts, for example, but I’m not a fan of gummies and other sweets that are just pure flavored sugar — they just don’t do it for me anymore. I have one bite, and I’m done for the day.”

Various gummy candies in dispensers and trays, including gummies, licorice, and sour belts, displayed in a candy store
Adam Bartosik / Getty Images

u/Potential-Feline

4. “Drama. Peace is starting to feel way more exciting.”

u/Djentri

5. “Is it weird that as I get older, I really hate the wind? More so than any other weather condition. Maybe it’s the fear of being a homeowner, and it being the most likely to cause damage.”

Person struggles with an inside-out umbrella on a windy day, wearing a puffy jacket and glasses, with trees in the background
Chalabala / Getty Images

Advertisement

u/dbarila

6. “Don’t change shit up on me no more. No, I don’t want to do more with Outlook. No, I don’t want a new iOS. I’ll take my chances with one-factor authentication. I don’t want a bigger infotainment system in my truck. I’m good right here with how things are for the rest of my life.”

u/ForgeIsDown

Related: Everyone Is Acting Like An A-Hole Lately, So Here Are 50 Photos Of Absolutely Infuriating People

7. “Loud music. I used to think that having a subwoofer and sound system was the single most important upgrade to the car.”

Two people sitting on a couch, playfully covering their ears, smiling. Modern kitchen with fruit and flowers in the background
Dobrila Vignjevic / Getty Images

u/XOM_CVX

8. “Getting older. It was awesome for a while there. These days, though, dear lord, make it stop.”

u/EnchantedTaquito8252

9. “Movies and TV shows. I’m definitely not a prude, but I really prefer films and series that are more tasteful and leave more to the imagination in bedroom scenes. Most sex scenes are so ridiculous and gratuitous that they’re distracting and totally unnecessary in the story.”

Person sitting on a couch, holding a remote, looking thoughtful. They are wearing a casual sweater and jeans
Littlebee80 / Getty Images

u/Ecstatic_Drink1485

Related: “We All Watched In Horror”: Former Students Are Sharing How The “Cool Person” In School Made A Decision That Altered Their Life For The Worse

10. “Deciding what to eat every day and having to fucking cook it. I don’t know; it’s just such a big task for me at the end of the day after work.”

u/Chamshrew

11. “Holidays and the expectation of spending money on meaningless bullshit just to further capitalism.”

Person wearing a Santa hat and fuzzy coat, holding a stack of gift boxes with an overwhelmed expression, standing among clothing racks
Nicoletaionescu / Getty Images

u/Not2NotFamiliar

12. “Outings on a WEEKNIGHT. I don’t even want to go to the mailbox after work on a weeknight.”

u/TileFloor

13. “Wearing fancy shoes! I was a fashion editor in my 20s, and at the time, there seemed to be a considerable overlap between the chicest of shoes and the least comfortable shoes. Somehow, someway, I just dealt with the pain.”

Two people walking with shopping bags. One wears a blazer and heels, the other a coat and flats. Image for an article on Internet Finds
Ivan Pantic / Getty Images

Advertisement

“Now, I am 41 and wore some three-inch heels to last year’s company Christmas party and am still traumatized by the days of pain that followed. I felt like Danny Glover circa Lethal Weapon: ‘I’m getting too old for this shit.'”

u/theWildBore

14. “Screaming little children that their parents think are adorable. Guess what? They aren’t.”

u/indianasall

Related: People Are Sharing The Creepiest Shit That’s Ever Happened In Their Own Homes, And WTF???????

15. “Alcohol. I had a lot of fun drinking in my 20s, and hangovers were manageable, but once I hit my mid-30s, the severity of hangovers started to outweigh the fun. Now, at 40, it’s not even close. I would be totally content with never getting drunk again.”

Person in a white shirt pouring a drink at a bar, with another hand gently stopping the pour to signal "no more."
Domepitipat / Getty Images

u/definitelysuperchill

16. “Men. I know it’s not fair, but I’ve had it with the lot of them, and I do everything I can to avoid them when possible. My doctor is a woman, my lawyer is a woman, my accountant is a woman, my trainer is a woman, my dentist is a woman, and my eye doctor is a woman.”

“If I’m at the grocery store, and I have the choice between two different cashiers and the woman’s line is longer, I will still take her line. I’m not mean or rude to them. I just avoid them as much as I possibly can.”

Advertisement

u/thegreatdoover

And finally, here’s one that I’m sure many people can agree they’ve also started to like less and less as they’ve aged:

17. “The Government. Growing up, everyone told me I’d become more conservative as I got older. Yeah, no, if anything, I’ve become more liberal as I’ve gotten older and understood more how greatly our government is failing us. Yes, I’m in the USA.”

Person holding a sign that reads, "Enough is Enough," at a protest
Jeanne Sager Photography / Getty Images

u/GoldDustWitchQueen

Do you want to chime in on things you’ve started to like less as you’ve aged? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments, or if you want to remain anonymous, you can use the form below!

Also in Internet Finds: “And That’s How A Christmas Party Dies”: People Are Sharing The Most Unhinged Things That Happened At A Family Dinner, And I Have Severe Secondhand Embarrassment

Also in Internet Finds: “We See You Finishing”: 46 Hilarious Images That Scream “This Was No Accident”

Also in Internet Finds: 16 People Who Were So Accidentally Hilarious I Literally Had To Stop What I Was Doing And Share Their Posts With Everyone

Read it on BuzzFeed.comView comments(56)

© 2025 Yahoo. All rights reserved.


Washington Post

Peter Whoriskey

Sat, November 15, 2025 at 11:09 AM CST

The cheap health insurance promoted by Trump officials has this catch

Robert Hays, an industrial electronics salesman in Arkansas, thought he’d purchased conventional medical insurance. So did Essie Nath, 67, a retired cafeteria worker in Wyoming. So did Martin Liz, 47, a Key West chef.

Each enrolled in the kind of private health insurance that Trump administration officials have promoted as an alternative to plans sold under Obamacare.

The difference between the two options became all too clear after Hays, Nath and Liz required surgery: Their cheaper policies left them facing bills of tens of thousands of dollars. Hays is facing bills of $116,000 for neck surgery required after tweaking his neck while lifting weights; Nath had heart failure and got bills of $82,000; Liz is stuck with bills of more than $100,000 for a knee replacement.

(The Trumpelstilskin scams continues, wine, steaks, college and now healthcare. There is no Red and Blue states in these scams)

“These policies are a horrible idea,” said Ken Swindle, an Arkansas-based attorney for Hays. “People think they’re getting comprehensive medical coverage, but they’re not, and they often don’t realize that until it’s too late.”

With enhanced government subsidies for Obamacare plans expiring this year and millions of Americans facing soaring insurance costs, many are expected to consider enrolling in the kind of “short-term” plans bought by Hays, Nath and Liz.

Unlike most insurance, these plans are not required to cover preexisting conditions or even basic needs such as maternity care and mental health. Their coverage is so full of holes that five states have banned their sale, according to KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group. Even some major insurers have questioned whether relying on the short-term plans is a good idea, warning that many consumers could mistake them for comprehensive coverage. The Biden administration referred to them as “junk” plans.

The policies tend to be cheaper, though, costing as little as half as much as a plan sold on HealthCare.gov or state-run marketplaces created by the landmark Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. For example, for a 40-year-old nonsmoker in Florida, the cheapest ACA plan may cost about $500 a month, while a short-term plan would be $320. Millions of people have signed up for them.

Millions looking for cheaper options

Now, as millions of consumers see huge spikes in Obamacare costs, many seeking a cheaper alternative will entertain the short-term plans as a viable option, insurance agents said. “Costs continue to go up, leaving individuals, families, and businesses scrambling to find and keep the coverage they need,” said Kelly Loussedes, vice president of NABIP, a trade group representing more than 100,000 licensed health insurance agents, brokers and consultants. “It’s essential that consumers understand these plans are not comprehensive coverage.”


Thank the Old-world English speakers. Let’s see that on a Red cap!!


The current administration is following the path of no return in its running of the government. There are many norms and accepted practices that no longer apply. The so-called American Dream has become a Nightmare without a “wake up”. The vengeful child has control of the country via the weak GOP who once was a powerful force for American values. This politically powerful group has forgotten the oath of office taken when elected and ceded its power to the “child”. At this time there appears to be no control in government as the founders had put in place. The real control of government has been quietly usurped by groups or a group of powerful people who saw a way to put their hands deeply in government through a “useful tools” ego.

It is sad that so many voters have been led to believe what is being done to other Americans (or other nations for that matter) is somehow other worldly and will not affect them. It is sad that so many forget the lessons of the past and still rely on the words of shady charismatic characters who offer words with no substance. The evidence is clear that the resident is a loose cannon being used as a” “useful idiot” by his own party and his “handpicked” Whitehouse staff and cabinet. Even “jar Jar Binks” recognized his limitations not so with the current “Nerolistic” occupant of the “peoples house”! It only requires a cursory glance at history to understand that a mistake was made in electing a “nihilist” as leader of one the most powerful countries in the world. The machinations of this regime is based on ego and past or current “hurt” feelings!

For the folks who read and understand the current politics or have the ability to see through the fog of lies and deceit the Franklin quote should be a wakeup call.

  1. The story: As delegates left the Constitutional Convention, a woman asked Franklin if the new government was a republic or a monarchy. Franklin famously replied, “A republic, madam, if you can keep it,” implying that maintaining the new form of government would be a continuous challenge requiring civic engagement. 
  2. The meaning: The quote suggests that a republic is not a permanent state but something that must be actively protected and maintained by its people. It underscores the importance of vigilance, civic duty, and the people’s role in holding the government accountable. 
  3. Historical context: The quote has become a well-known and relevant statement, particularly during times of political division, serving as a reminder of the framers’ intentions and the responsibilities of citizenship. 

As I have stated several times: “Lest we forget”!


Correct information authored by: By Lauren Walcott and James Ziegeweid,Published June 27, 2025 Congressional Hunger Center Emerson Fellows begins below Fake chart shown on X.

Madeup chart below put out on X totally misleading about SNAP recipents-possible cause of attack on SNAP recipents.

Published June 27, 2025

Annually, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issues a report on the characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The most recent report released in April provides details about fiscal year 2023 program participants, and critical insights for lawmakers, advocates, and stakeholders, while simultaneously pushing back against harmful narratives that have been perpetuated about households participating in SNAP.  

Key Takeaways  

  • SNAP provides food assistance to the most vulnerable. The vast majority of individuals participating in the program are children, older adults, or individuals with a disability. The report highlights that 39 percent of participants were children, 20 percent were older adults, and 10 percent were individuals with disabilities. Additionally, 73 percent of households participating in SNAP had a gross monthly income at or below the federal poverty line. In fiscal year 2023, the income level for a family of four at the federal poverty line was $27,750.   
  • SNAP serves people of all racial and ethnic backgrounds. Among program participants, over 35 percent identified as White, nearly 26 percent as African American, nearly 16 percent as Hispanic, 4 percent as Asian, and a little over 1 percent as Native American. It should be noted that 17 percent of participants are listed as “race unknown.”  
  • SNAP helps workers make ends meet. Nearly one-third of SNAP households have earned income. For SNAP households with children, 55 percent had earned income. The average SNAP household’s gross monthly income is $1,059 and net income is $527. 
  • Most SNAP households do not receive cash welfare benefits. Only 3 percent of all SNAP households, and only 7.8 percent of SNAP households with children, receive benefits through the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. 
  • SNAP lifts households out of poverty. Among households participating in SNAP, 17 percent moved above the federal poverty line when SNAP benefits were included in gross income, and 10 percent of the lowest-income SNAP households moved out of deep poverty. 
  • Despite the many benefits of the program, SNAP benefit levels continue to be woefully inadequate. About 36 percent of SNAP households receive the maximum allotment. The other 64 percent of participating households receive less than the maximum. The average benefit is just $6 per person per day. As described in a prior FRAC analysis, the greatest shortcoming of SNAP is that benefits for most households are not enough to get them through the entire month without hunger or being forced to sacrifice nutrition quality. 

Time and again, SNAP has been found to be a profoundly important program with well-documented benefits for participants and their communities. As shown in this report from USDA, SNAP targets households that are struggling the most, reducing hunger and poverty for millions of people annually.  

For more information about SNAP, visit the SNAP section of FRAC’s website.