Skip navigation

Tag Archives: Putting it out there


Trumpelstilskin is delivering on his promise while campaigning for the Presidency. As always, he attributes his actions aka failures to someone else. It’s odd that his entire administration has no experienced people in the cabinet and one has to wonder why he was elected!  He has effectively left this country vulnerable with illegal expenditure of munitions in Iran. Impeachment is required to save the nation. Any legislator who disagrees needs to leave office with him. Remember who they are supposed to work for!


Suppose we were able to have all of the past legislators (and some current) from both parties who really spoke and worked for the voters and the country, would we be better off? With all of the negatives we have experienced from various members of Congress we should be smarter in voting, yet we are not! I struggle to remain as neutral as I can in politics but the past political climate from pre-civil war until now has shown me that the political parties fail regularly, it comes down to who fails the least or causes the least harm to voters. Flexible voters should be our goal-not locked in parties.

The success of a country depends largely on the people being engaged in the election process by a reasonable knowledge of what their elected officials are doing on their behalf. We have all heard, seen or experienced political rallies that promise actions and fail to deliver. Denigrate their opponents to get votes and still do not deliver! It ONLY takes a little more reading or listening to several news sources for a realistic view of what is happening in our daily lives. Politics seems to have two primary effects on those who run for office and win, they either go high or they go low each extreme land on the heads of the voters. This constantly moving event causes irrational voting and understanding of what is being done leaving the door open for misinformation and division between voters according to their place in life.

I am sure everyone who looks at any news has seen or heard any news understands (or should) that the current administration is corrupt and dishonest. We all marvel at how people we elect (some of them) go into the office poor (so to speak) and leave well heeled. Prime examples: Mitch McConnell, Mike

Madigan. The dailies on the current Presidiot are jaw dropping! Truumpel went into the office a mere Millionaire (if we are to believe him) and is now in less than a year is a billionaire! Congress has said nothing or done nothing except chase down Dr. Anthony Fauchi. Voters have the power to end it


Dude made a deal with the Saud’s for Nuclear abilities in exchange for? Most likely some deal for himself and his family. It should be understood that the dude is out for himself and not the United States. Essentially, he is stealing in plain sight! His ineptitude is classic to say the least and prominent in his “deals” which always result in his enrichment! He needs to go!!


The  “Pseudo Midas Touch” is tarnishing by the day. The projects started and unfinished are in reality the M.O. of the Trumpel’s life’s work. Grifters never have any ready cash except when elected president of a rich country. Fortunately and unfortunately the truth is evident in the country’s dignity, the national pride and international prestige. The incompetence of this Presidiot is on display around the world and especially by his heroes in Russia, China and other dictatorial countries. His international persona is that of a “useful” idiot (aka Bumbling) who trips on his own shoelaces.


The Difference made me curious, are we either of these or something else.? MA

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian political ideology that emphasizes nationalism, militarism, and the supremacy of the state over individual rights. It emerged in the early 20th century, notably in Italy under Benito Mussolini, and is characterized by:

  • Authoritarian, centralized government with suppression of political opposition and dissent.
  • Nationalist ideology that often promotes exclusionary or exclusionist policies toward minorities.
  • Corporatist economic model where the state coordinates labor and capital, often suppressing unions.
  • Militarization and glorification of military strength.
  • Suppression of civil liberties in favor of collective identity and state control thisvsthat.io+1.

Social Democracy is a center-left political ideology that supports democratic governance, social welfare, and equality. It developed in the late 19th century in response to industrialization and inequality, and is marked by:

  • Democratic institutions with protections for individual rights and freedoms.
  • Mixed economy with government regulation to ensure social welfare, economic stability, and fairness.
  • Progressive taxation and public investment in healthcare, education, and social security.
  • Commitment to social justice and inclusivity, often advocating for progressive values and anti-discrimination policies thisvsthat.io+1.

Key differences:

  • Governance: Fascism is totalitarian and authoritarian; Social Democracy is democratic and participatory.
  • Economy: Fascism centralizes economic control; Social Democracy blends market economy with state intervention for welfare.
  • Individual vs. Collective: Fascism prioritizes collective identity over individual rights; Social Democracy protects individual freedoms while promoting equality.
  • Social policy: Fascism often promotes traditional values and exclusion; Social Democracy emphasizes inclusivity and progressive social reforms thisvsthat.io+1.

In short, Fascism seeks to unify society under a single, authoritarian state with suppressed dissent, while Social Democracy seeks to strengthen democracy and protect rights through social welfare and inclusive policies.

Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole:

Populism: a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups

Social Democracy: a system of liberal democracy that incorporates a commitment to social reform and social justice.

Fascist:an advocate or follower of the right-wing political philosophy or system of fascism


Story by Christopher Luu • 3h • 2 min read Irish Star

President Donald Trump’s golf empire is expanding — at the expense of families having to move their loved ones’ remains. The Trump Organization’s latest golf project is set to cost $1.5 billion and is forcing communities in the Chau Ninh commune of the Hung Yen province near Hanoi to figure out how to remove remains from a local cemetery ahead of construction.

The Financial Times reports that some graves in the cemetery are now marked with large Xs, indicating that families have already removed the remains. The area is largely an agricultural community, and locals are being compensated with $2,660 payments. The resort is set to span 2,446 acres and displace 4,000 households.

“It’s painful,” Hoang Do, 72, told the Financial Times of the payment, which is equivalent to 70 million dong. “I’m outraged by the compensation price.” This comes as Trump took issue with one of JD Vance’s traits as 2028 doubts emerge.

“The grave of my great-grandparents has been there since 1967, before the establishment of this country [after the Vietnam War], so why should I move them?” another local, 50-year-old Hoang Anh Xa, shared. Hoang added that they have five family members in the graveyard that will have to be moved.

In addition to moving their family members to other facilities, Xa noted that the golf course will cause harm to the local community: “I won’t be able to find another job. We do not oppose the policy of the Party and the government. We just ask for one thing only, the land price has to be [higher].”

When the project was announced last year, Reuters reported that “farmers were being offered as little as $12 for 10 square feet of land.” Some residents were being offered even less, with one woman sharing that she was being offered the equivalent of $3,200 and rice in exchange for selling her farm.

Trump’s son, Eric, called the new resort “the envy of all of Asia and of the entire world.” During a trip to Vietnam in 2025, a joint statement between the Trump Organization and real estate firm Kinhbac City shared that they “will focus on developing 5-star hotels, championship-style golf courses, and luxurious residential estates and unparalleled amenities in Vietnam.”

Visit Irish Star


We are in the clutches of a corrupt President with a complicit GOP and a willing High court. There are always a few outliers in both of those groups but not enough (usually) to fall to the will of a corrupt official. The high court has only their integrity and their qualifications to support their appointments. Unfortunately, in the last 20 plus years the integrity portion seems to have waned and overlooked or explained away (privately) while Congressional approval moves forward. below are the details of a Justice’s appointment and removal-a bit of a long read MA

A Supreme Court justice can only be removed through impeachment by the House of Representatives and conviction by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.

Constitutional Basis and Lifetime Tenure

Supreme Court justices are appointed for life under Article III of the U.S. Constitution, serving until they resign, retire, die, or are removed through impeachment. This lifetime tenure is designed to protect judicial independence, ensuring justices can make decisions without political pressure. Justices cannot be removed by the president, Congress, or public vote outside of the impeachment process, and their salaries cannot be reduced while in office legalclarity.org+1.

Impeachment Process

  1. Initiation in the House of Representatives: A member of the House introduces articles of impeachment, formally accusing the justice of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” legalclarity.org+1. The House Judiciary Committee investigates, holds hearings, and decides whether to send the articles to the full House. A simple majority vote in the House is sufficient to impeach, which formally charges the justice but does not remove them The Hill+1.
  2. Senate Trial: After impeachment, the Senate conducts a trial to determine guilt. The justice has the right to defend themselves, present evidence, and be represented by counsel. The presiding officer is typically a Senate-designated official; the Chief Justice presides only if the president is being tried legalclarity.org+1.
  3. Conviction and Removal: Conviction requires a two-thirds majority of senators present. If convicted, the justice is removed from office and may also be barred from holding future federal office legalclarity.org+1. This high threshold makes removal extremely rare.

Historical Context

Only one Supreme Court justice, Samuel Chase, has ever been impeached (in 1805). He was accused of political bias and misconduct but was acquitted by the Senate and remained on the Court until his death in 1811 verisonalaw.com+2. No justice has ever been successfully removed through impeachment, highlighting the rarity and difficulty of the process.

Alternative to Removal

A justice may also leave the bench voluntarily through resignation or retirement, which is the most common way justices depart from the Supreme Court legalclarity.org+1.

Key Takeaways

Justices typically leave the Court through resignation or death, not removal.
This framework ensures accountability while maintaining the impartiality and stability of the Supreme Court.

Removal is constitutionally limited to impeachment and Senate conviction.

The process is intentionally difficult to protect judicial independence.

Historical precedent shows that removal is extraordinarily rare, with only one impeachment and no successful convictions.


The political Mafia (aka Trump Organization) has taken over the government and dragged the criminal ruling class from each state with it. There is no other way to say it. The Federal Government as it is right now can be likened to the “Star Wars” saga. We have elected the basest members of society to represent us under a thin cape of “honesty” and strength to fight for us. To quote another Movie: “What we have is a failure to communicate”. There is no other way we can overcome this is the power of the vote (guided by facts). The once trustworthy streams of information are now suspect in the information they provide except for the comic strips that dare to poke fun at politicians and their politics. Make no mistake we are now under the leaky umbrella of long time suspected and now confirmed grifter on a grand scale. The common denominator is “proof of concept”- we have always suspected the political class and we have been proven correct more times that we should have to experience. OUR ONE JOB (as voters) is to forget party lines if possible and pay attention to who is running for office (new or incumbent) and determine by facts if they are worth your support. Remember the good and bad often meld into “tolerable” as far as politics go.

We may have to abide by “tolerable” to survive these next few years, with that exercise any of the several avenues of contacts with the existing seat fillers and voice your opinion-OFTEN!


The Reconstruction era (1865–1877) was the period after the American Civil War focused on reintegrating the Southern states into the Union and defining the rights of newly freed African Americans.OverviewThe Reconstruction era followed the Civil War and addressed the challenges of abolishing slavery, restoring the Union, and integrating millions of formerly enslaved people into American society and politics. It involved significant legal, social, and political changes, including the passage of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, which abolished slavery, established birthright citizenship, guaranteed due process and equal protection under the law, and prohibited racial discrimination in voting. Wikipedia+2Phases of ReconstructionPresidential Reconstruction (1865–1867): Led by President Andrew Johnson, this phase was lenient toward the former Confederate states, allowing them to quickly reestablish governments with minimal requirements. Southern legislatures enacted restrictive Black Codes to control the labor and behavior of African Americans. History+1
Radical Reconstruction (1867–1877): Congress, dominated by Radical Republicans, imposed stricter conditions for Southern readmission, including ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and granting voting rights to Black men. The South was divided into five military districts to enforce federal authority and protect African Americans. During this period, African Americans actively participated in politics, holding public office at local, state, and national levels. 
Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History+2Achievements and ChallengesReconstruction restored the federal Union, established a legal framework for racial equality, and temporarily empowered African Americans politically. Freedmen’s Bureau programs provided food, shelter, education, and legal support to newly freed people. However, the era faced violent resistance from white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan, and Southern states implemented measures such as poll taxes and literacy tests to suppress Black political participation. Wikipedia+2LegacyAlthough many Reconstruction reforms were rolled back after 1877, when federal troops withdrew from the South, the constitutional amendments laid the foundation for the civil rights movement of the 20th century. Historians now view Reconstruction as both a period of significant progress in interracial democracy and a time of unfulfilled promises due to systemic resistance and racial violence. Wikipedia+2Broader ContextReconstruction also intersected with national developments, including economic changes in the North and West, the rise of the Gilded Age, and debates over federal versus state authority. The era remains a critical chapter in understanding the evolution of American citizenship, civil rights, and the ongoing struggle for racial equality. Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History+1


First rule of political issues: do your homework, do not I repeat DO NOT take promises and statements from ANY politician as fact without investigating issue yourself. All statements may not be false, but you owe it to yourself to spend a little extra time sourcing the basis of that information. It does not matter if you like facts, you just to have them to make intelligent voting decisions. Remember as a general rule all politicians lie (or stretch b the truth) but often their words or beliefs are generated by speech writers and influencers. Common sense always prevails and 99.9% of us have it, so engage that gear!