Skip navigation

Tag Archives: current-events


Ok, what is up with this? This is similar to the long ago German sweep of “non Aryans” and “undesirables” (even considering the strange proclivities of the Reich’s hierarchy. Is this the same as the Lunch counter sit ins? maybe. To determine who is gay what will be required? ID cards, certain clothing or some other Identifying item or marks? This is probably one of most ridiculous things I have ever  heard. As I understand it, the supporters of this law are protecting their religious rights so let” he who is without sin cast the first stone”! This a poor business model to say the least as ALL money is green and spends the same anywhere.

Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)

Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)

Arizona’s Push For Legal Discrimination Against Gays

Arizona, on the cusp of a law allowing businesses to refuse to serve gays. We’ll dive in.

Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)
Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)

A bunch of states are now considering – and Arizona’s state legislature has now passed – law that would allow businesses, individuals, to discriminate against gay customers on religious grounds. Deny them service. Ohio, Mississippi, Idaho, South Dakota, Tennessee and Oklahoma have all seen similar legislation introduced. But Arizona – where it all hinges now on Gov. Jan Brewer’s signature or veto – is out front. Supporters say it’s about religious liberty. Critics say its carte blanche for straight up discrimination. This hour On Point: gay rights, religious liberty and the law in Arizona.

Please Donate

Please Donate


The attached article caught my eye as another way to “combat obesity and related health issues, the basic premise is OK but will the overall effect cause the not obese or diabetic as much distress as the targeted subjects? It is stated in studies that the well pay for the sick (it has always been that way) but can a soft drink excise tax do the job? It will be a number of years and test cases before it becomes law but during that time will any REAL data emerge that would encourage the at risk to do something on their own after all these “soft” drinks and their contents are as addictive as any illegal consumables
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Time right for soda tax, proponents say
Business groups vow to fight it
By Tobias Wall
State Capitol Bureau
The head of a public health advocacy group says now’s the right time to push again for a state tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, even though similar efforts have failed and even though proponents face a fight from business groups.

Illinois Public Health Institute CEO Elissa Bassler said last week that after years of research and discussion, “it seemed like it was reasonable to have legislation introduced.”
“We got a lot of positive feedback from legislators this year so we wanted to
move forward,” she said.
Sen. Mattie Hunter, D-Chicago, and Rep. Robyn Gabel, D-Evanston, filed the Healthy Eating and Active Living Act in the Senate and House last week that would impose a 1-cent-per-ounce excise tax on regular and diet sodas, beverages that are less than 50 percent juice, sports drinks and ready-to-drink coffees and teas.
A Cook County Department of Public Health study published in 2011 estimated that at current consumption levels, a penny-per-ounce excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Illinois could generate more than $600 million and cut statewide consumption of those beverages by almost 150 million gallons.

Other estimates in the study suggest that the tax could play a role in a reduction of as many as 3,400 new cases of diabetes each year, saving up to $20.7 million in diabetes-related health-care costs. Obesity-related healthcare costs could be reduced by more than $150 million.
At least half of the revenue generated from the tax would be set aside to shore up Medicaid, which has been the victim of recent funding cuts. The other half would go to education and prevention programs that aim to curb obesity, diabetes and other illnesses.
The bill calls for the formation of an advisory board tasked with deciding which programs would get grant money generated by the tax.
Gabel said the board would include representatives from the State Board of Education, the Illinois Department of Public Health and other health organizations.
Pass-along costs?
Since the legislation was announced Wednesday, Hunter said she’s added four chief co-sponsors to the bill in the Senate.
but as support picks up steam, business groups with ties to the beverage industry are lining up in opposition.
“We’re not just going to sit back, we’re going to be aggressively opposing the bill,” said Illinois Beverage Association executive director Timothy Bramlet, who noted that the industry had already taken its first step in the fight by forming the Illinois Coalition Against Beverage Taxes.
The coalition argues that the added expense to distributors would put already-thin margins in danger. In addition, the tax would get passed along to consumers who would see a bump in shelf prices for sugar-sweetened beverages.
If fewer people decide to purchase those drinks, opponents say producers will have no choice but to respond to a shrinking market by slashing jobs.
Bassler said the decision was made to push for an excise tax rather than a sales tax because research shows sales taxes don’t achieve the desired effect.
“One important distinction is that (the research) authors and economists articulate that a sales tax doesn’t have an impact on consumption,” she said.
One of the Cook County study’s authors, Dr. Frank Chaloupka, professor of economics at the University of Illinois-Chicago, said, “Sales taxes aren’t really apparent to consumers” because they’re relatively low. He said that by the time consumers check out at a register, a sales tax isn’t enough to cause them to rethink the decision to buy something.
Excise taxes, on the other hand, are built into the retail price and could dissuade consumers from making the purchase in the first place, he said.
For example, under the act, a 24-pack of soda would cost an additional $2.88 — and that’s before the 6.25 percent sales tax Illinois already tacks onto soda.
Get people talking
Despite the additional revenue, agencies in line to receive grants generated by the tax wouldn’t be able to count on stable revenue year over year.
If the HEAL Act is passed into law, and if the law works as intended, consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages will fall, bringing revenue generated from the tax down with it.
Gabel said she’s prepared to tell public health personnel that could be the case. It shouldn’t be a problem, she said, because workers in that sector have become accustomed to such uncertainty.
“It doesn’t worry me,” Hunter said. “The more people we educate and the more they take the products out of their diet, we can focus on the folks who need the most assistance.”
Hunter said that even if the law works perfectly, some people will still drink sugarsweetened beverages.
“That’s on them. They still have that choice,” she said.
At any rate, Hunter and Gabel expect a long and difficult fight.
“My experience with bills that have a lot of opposition is that in the first year, it’s hard to get them out of committee,” Gabel said.
However, the effort will get people talking about the issue, she said.
“As people recognize sugarsweetened beverages as one of the main sources of added calories and sugar in our diets, they’ll become more sensitive to it,”

Gabel said. Contact Tobias Wall: 782-3095, toby.wall@sj-r.com, twitter.com/reTcWall


This post was brought to my attention and I think we should all read it and receive one of the best reads on the President’s term in office so far.

Frank Schaeffer

New York Times best-selling author

 GET UPDATES FROM Frank Schaeffer

<!– –>

To Those Predicting Healthcare Reform Failure: The Evidence of Obama’s Achievements Shows You’re on the Wrong Side of History — Again
Posted: 11/19/2013  5:08 pm

 There are Obama haters aplenty, have been from Day One: Snooty left wingers have offered advice he should have, could have, would have followed to success if the president had just listened to his white betters in the media. Hate-filled right wing bigots have jostled to be the loudest claiming Obama isn’t a “real American,” not one of us, from somewhere else, a liar, a communist, a Muslim, the anti-Christ… and that’s just a start.

Economists have lined up on all sides to predict his policies would fail, that we were headed for depression, world economic collapse, and higher unemployment. Hawks told us the president was giving in to terror, maybe he was a terrorist himself. Doves told us he’s a mass murderer, using drones to target the innocent.

Civil libertarians told us Obama is creating a surveillance state, that he’s Orwell’s worst nightmare personified. That, of course is when he’s not selling us down the river to terrorists, as the Religious Right claims or turning our children into gays.

The Religious Right also tells us that the president is a baby-killer, wants to destroy marriage, hates families, and is in league with a global gay conspiracy to coddle pedophiles. Speaking of pedophiles, the Roman Catholic bishops – when not busy with settling lawsuits on behalf of abused children their priests raped – have told us that the president is anti-religion, anti-Catholic and anti-religious freedom, all because he hasn’t kowtowed to them and insisted that women are given full health coverage, including access to contraception. The president has only been forced to tell one untruth, and it’s not that everyone could keep their coverage irrespective of how bad their so-called insurance was. That was a misstatement. It’s this: He’s never been able to say that the bitterness of his opponents stems from the fact he’s black. Not everyone who opposes the president is a racist. But race embarrasses us. We try not to mention it. We pretend we’re a less race-divided country than we are.

The president can’t say that because then on top of everything else he’d be accused of being an angry black man. Pundits like to tell us how well Tip O’Neill and Ronald Reagan got on and worked together. Why can’t the president be like that? The two Irish-Americans on opposite sides of the issues back in the good old days were both white, that’s why. One of them wasn’t facing a party of obstruction and hatred so irrational they would risk the entire world economy to make a point, that’s why!

With the economy salvaged from the toilet, two unnecessary wars ended, America’s standing retrieved from the lowest point it’s ever been that W Bush brought us to, with our dollar taken from worthless to the world currency again, our educational system retreating from free fall, any minimally fit president who had held all that together would be ahead in the polls… if he happened to be white.

The Democrats put forward the brightest, most compelling and inspiring candidate since Franklin Roosevelt. He won. But he did not change the blighted elitist heart of the white ruling class – Left or Right – used to being in charge. I say this as a white, 61 year-old former Republican and former Evangelical leader, who was turned into an Obama supporter by my disgust with the hijacking of the Republican Party by a bunch of anti-American revolutionaries. (See my new book And God Said, “Billy!“ exploring the roots of American religious delusion, and offering a way to better understand what I mean by the term “anti-American revolutionaries.”)

Senator Obama won scholarships to America’s top academic institutions, was voted by his peers to be editor of the Harvard Law Review, is a family man with an exemplary and obviously loving marriage, has a wife who is a brilliant charismatic woman, two lovely children, is a born-again Christian comfortable with his faith, has avoided making the fast buck in the new gilded age of greed when he could have, served his community, is thoughtful, considered in his opinions, slow to anger, proved right in his judgment about the Iraq war, the economy and just about everything else, looks at every side of a question before making a decision, and is not given to grandstanding let alone defending himself. That is who I voted for twice. That is who the president still is.

And now we come to the “healthcare reform debacle.” It is a “debacle” just as the economy was a debacle. In other words it isn’t. Check the stock market lately? Check the employment numbers lately? Check the wind-down of our wars lately? Check the whereabouts of bin Laden lately? Check the falling crime rates lately? Check the fact our deficit is dropping and that we are closer to energy self sufficiency than ever.?

Turns out all the worst case forecasts about President Obama have been wrong. No, he hasn’t fixed everything. But, in spite of the racist, crazy Tea Party, the evangelical haters and the supercilious, know-it-all liberals who harass Obama, the president has done A LOT! President Obama remains the most intellectually and emotionally even-tempered and best equipped President we have had in the modern era. And even with the entire machinery of the Republican establishment and much of the media rooting for and egging on the “failure” of his Affordable Care Act, he will prevail.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not expert on health care reform. But given the actual record of achievement of this president I’m betting against the bigots and the know-it-all-pundits. Based on how all the other “disasters” and “failures” this president “created”– by not listening to Tea Party/evangelical bigots and white “liberal” commentators… I’m betting President Obama gets the Affordable Care Act website fixed, survives this current chapter of the slow-motion lynching that’s characterized his presidency, and wins this round too.

Today the president’s poll numbers are down. Thirty years from now the word “Obamacare” will be right up there with the other things we take for granted as the bedrock of our civil society. In President Obama we were given two extraordinary gifts; a great President and a national mirror. Looking into that mirror we just learned who we really are.

Like our national reaction to Jackie Robinson — the American baseball player who became the first African American to play in Major League — we’ve learned that one brave decent black man has had the fortitude to call us to a better place by what he did NOT say or do in his defense. The question is not will President Obama fail, but who are we?

Frank Schaeffer is a writer. His latest book — And God Said, “Billy!“ exploring the roots of American religious delusion, and offering another way to approach true spirituality, is on Kindle, iBook and NOOK for $3.99, and in paperback.

Please Donate

Please Donate

            


 The accompanying article in the New York times is indicative of how uninformed many Americans are and sometimes ridiculous. My Daughter is currently going through chemo and at the end will have a lumpectomy and hopefully a scar no bigger than this. If anyone looking at this photo is disturbed by it, block out the photo and just read the article then look at the photo perhaps there would be more support for the cancer issue .

The front-page photo that touched off the brouhaha. Courtesy of The New York TimesWhen the New York Times ran a powerful front-page photo illustrating a breast-cancer gene story on Wednesday, it touched off a major controversy. One missing voice in the din, though, was that of the 28-year-old woman in the photo—whose face was not in the frame but whose upper torso, including a lumpectomy scar, small Star of David tattoo, and partial left areola were there for all to see. But on Monday she spoke out, albeit anonymously, to the New York Times.
More on Shine: Facebook Allows Mastectomy Photos: Tattooed Model in Controversial Picture Speaks Out
“When I first saw the photo I did not find it either provocative or inappropriate,” begins her personal statement, published by the newspaper on Monday. “I thought it was powerful and told my story—I am a proud, young Jewish woman who had breast cancer, and I have a scar that proves it. I am not ashamed or embarrassed by the scar.… I didn’t expect such controversy around the photo—but I’m glad the photo caused an impact.”
The accompanying article examines the high rate of breast cancer in Israel and the financial roadblocks some women face when considering gene testing and preventive surgeries. And the picture, according to Michele McNally, assistant managing editor in charge of photography at the Times, was perfectly illustrative. “It’s directly on point to the story,” she says in the New York Times Public Editor’s Journal last Wednesday, in a subsequent story about the photo controversy. “It conveys a lot of information. It brings the reality to light. It’s also very beautiful — the lighting, the composition, the tone.”
More on Yahoo: 23andMe Faces Class Action Lawsuit in California
Criticism was fierce, though, both in the newspaper’s comments and letters section and elsewhere online, on blogs and in social media. People noted a variety of reasons for being shocked and offended, from the tattoo, which reminded some readers of the Holocaust, to the fact that the disembodied image did not include the woman’s face or head. But the biggest problem seemed to be that of the nearly exposed nipple, which readers called “trashy,” “inappropriate” and “risqué.” The Drudge Report called the photo a “Peep Show” in a headline, while freaked-out tweets talked about “boobs” and warned, “Areola above the fold!” The shots continued: The Daily Caller criticized the paper for using “boob shots,” while Bustle noted that “the New York Times has managed to titillate and enrage the always-prim-and-proper Internet.”
On the other side, of course, have been those lambasting the critics. “There was discussion over this? Grow up,” reads one tweet. Another comment included, “Really? All this fuss over an areola? Hoping one day we’ll embrace human form instead of making it stupidly taboo?” and “As long as I live in America I will never get why nudity is so bad but violence is cool.”
Slate featured essays from both points of view, with Amanda Marcotte noting that it’s “grossly inappropriate to sexualize breast cancer” and Jessica Winter writing, in response, “If a woman sees her breasts as part of her personal and sexual identity, that doesn’t mean she’s somehow the self-objectifying victim of patriarchal social conditioning.”
The national nonprofit Breast Cancer Action, meanwhile, an education and advocacy organization based in San Francisco, finds the whole back-and-forth depressing. “Our immediate response is, once again, we have something distracting us from the real issues,” spokesperson Angela Wall tells Yahoo Shine. “It was an excellent article about genetic testing and counseling, which hit all the right points. But now that’s lost in this mire of, ‘Is it appropriate for a woman to show her breast when discussing breast cancer?’ I find it incredibly sad.”
But the organization, which runs a campaign called “Think Before You Pink” to challenge corporate profits and the “pinkwashing” of breast cancer, does not blame the photo choice. “It’s a provocative photograph, and breast cancer is a provocative issue,” Wall notes. “It’s a nice, pink, cozy, safe thing to celebrate people surviving. But this is what women go through — this is what it looks like.”
And now, the photographed woman’s full statement to the New York Times:

When I first saw the photo I did not find it either provocative or inappropriate. I thought it was powerful and told my story – I am a proud, young Jewish woman who had breast cancer, and I have a scar that proves it. I am not ashamed or embarrassed by the scar. Most of my breast was not exposed and the small part that was does not make the picture “cheap.” I think it’s very artistic.
I didn’t expect such controversy around the photo – but I’m glad the photo caused an impact since I believe that there should be more awareness about breast cancer, genetic testing, the conflict of “what to do” with a positive result, etc.
I agreed to publish the photo since I wanted to raise awareness, but I decided to leave my identity unknown because I didn’t want to become famous because I had cancer. The cancer I fought this past year is a part of me, but it’s not who I am. It’s not me. In addition, this photo was taken spontaneously and I didn’t consult my close family beforehand, so I preferred to stay unknown.
In response to some readers’ comment on the tattoo I have on my body, I come from a family of Holocaust survivors. When I was 17, I went with my high school on a trip to the concentration camps in Poland. It was a very emotional and difficult trip, and when I returned to Israel I was so proud that I am Jewish and Israeli that I wanted the whole world to know. I will never have to hide my religion or where I come from. That’s when I made the tattoo of the Star of David. It was 10 years before my diagnosis of breast cancer.

Please Donate

Please Donate


During the last several years the Congress has wrangled, harangued and debated the budget publicly and privately. This discourse which is laced with vitriolic , doomsday predictions along with a sequester which damaged the economy and brought pain to many. This attached note shows that the previous acrimony was more political than idealistic as many in Congress will face election next year. My concern is: will the Congress learn anything from this? will the voter learn anything from it? I hope there is a moment of clarity for both. Do we need to be reminded that our elected officials care less about our needs even while invoking what “the people want” when they never asked our opinion? The note below shows that this budget “crisis” could have been done a while ago if the Congress pulled their heads out of the dark and did their work!

Congressional Negotiators Reach Budget Deal

Democratic and Republican negotiators have struck a deal on the budget, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., announced Tuesday. Ryan said the deal would reduce the deficit by $23 billion – without raising taxes. If approved by lawmakers in the House and Senate, the deal would, among other things, fund the government past Jan. 15 and replace the sequester – the automatic spending cuts — with longer-term savings for two years.

This story is developing. Check for further updates on NPR.org.

Please Donate

Please Donate


George has done it again! After being acquitted in the murder of Trayvon martin, George Zimmerman has continued his apparent usual behavior. He has been revealed as the aggressor (not in court) in real life. The latest incident ended in his being arrested, forbidden to have weapons and ammunition. After posting bond of $9000.00, Zimmerman was freed. This latest incident had him holding his girlfriend at shotgun pint after barricading the front door. This is an excerpt of the incident:

George Zimmerman was taken into custody Monday after girlfriend Samantha Scheibe told deputies he pointed a shotgun at her during an argument.

SANFORD, Fla. — A prosecutor says George Zimmerman’s girlfriend claims he choked her about a week ago but she didn’t report it to police at the time.

The prosecutor told a judge about the allegation during a first appearance Tuesday on domestic violence-related charges of aggravated assault, battery and criminal mischief.

The judge set George Zimmerman’s bond at $9,000 and ordered that he not possess guns or ammunition. He was ordered to stay away from the girlfriend’s house and wear a monitoring device.

Zimmerman, the former neighborhood watch volunteer who was acquitted of any charges in the 2012 fatal shooting of unarmed black teen Trayvon Martin, was charged Monday with aggravated assault, battery and criminal mischief after his 27-year-old girlfriend called 911.

Raw: Judge Sets Zimmerman Bond at $9,000

Raw: Judge Sets Zimmerman Bond at $9,000

Samantha Scheibe claimed Zimmerman had smashed a glass table, threatened her with a shotgun and ultimately pushed her out of the house she rented.

Scheibe told deputies the ordeal started with a verbal argument and that she asked Zimmerman to leave the house. Her account in the arrest report says he began packing his belongings, including a shotgun and an assault rifle. She says she began putting his things in the living room and outside the house, and he became upset. At that point, the report says, he took the shotgun out of its case.

Zimmerman told his girlfriend to leave and smashed a pair of her sunglasses as she walked toward the front door, the report says. Scheibe told deputies he pushed her out of the house when she got close to the door.

“You point your gun at my fricking face,” Scheibe is heard telling Zimmerman on a 911 call. “Get out of my house. Do not push me out of my house. Please get out of my house.”

Now what do you think the jurors are thinking about the man they acquitted of murdering Trayvon Martin?

Please Donate

Please Donate


At last the legislators and critics of “Obamacare” aka the “Affordable Health Care Act” have moved in the direction of repairing the issues with the law. What if there was not an election cycle coming? ,the flaws in the law would still be the subject of political rhetoric and public outcry. It  would have made more sense to read and understand the law before enacting so that it would roll out as smooth as possible.  Instead pundits and elected officials spent public capital on trashing the act, leaving the people in limbo and under informed. There has been ample time to make adjustments and apply fixes but that valuable time was misspent much like our votes for Legislators who have been in office much too long. In order for Congress to work as well as it could, the voters need to spend less time waiting for opinions from the media and put more time in forming their own opinions through the process of accessing multiple sources of information. Opinions and information from a single source is similar to: ” when I want your opinion, I will give it to you”.

Please Donate

Please Donate


The Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) has taken up more time than required for the 535 to just take up the issue of correcting or assisting in correcting the problems with its rollout and implementation. Unfortunately these folks have gone the route of Joseph McCarthy and Estes Kefauver. Incase no one remembers or knows, these two members of Congress consumed the airwaves with what is now known as witch hunts against  Communists and Juvenile crime  (Switch blades?) due to TV programming of the time. Personally I am pretty much done hearing and listening to the same old Cr** with no solutions or offers to help. All of the folks use the phrase: “the American people” when condemning the ACA yet they never asked the American people, the small sample they get is targeted and non representative therefore who are they really representing?   The fact that they are constantly blasting the program  is enough to show me that their only issue is a Democrat who happens to be Black and intelligent has a rational thought to help the “American people”  whom they have underserved for much of their time in office. While I may be a bit biased but could the “American People” please read all of the available information and disregard the inane ranting of the ensconced politicians who by the way are not so concerned with the American people until it’s election season! Now I ask: Are You tired of it?

Please Donate

Please Donate


The following article points out the double dealing the Dupublican caucus.

CUTS TO FOOD STAMP PROGRAM REVEAL CONGRESSIONAL HYPOCRISY

Cynthia TuckerBy Cynthia Tucker | Cynthia Tucker – Sat, Nov 2, 2013

For decades, I’ve proudly asserted that “nobody starves to death in America.” The comment has been addressed to acerbic critics of the American government, often foreign visitors, who insist that the United States is a mean-spirited place that casts aside its weak and fragile citizens. I still contend that nobody starves to death here, but I’ve had to modify my claims about the country’s social safety net. Even if no one dies for lack of basic nutrition, plenty of people go to bed hungry every night. And if Congress’ harsh Republican caucus has its way, some may starve.That’s because the band of ultraconservatives who control the House are bent on deep cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), otherwise known as food stamps. They passed a farm bill laden with welfare for farmers, but they left out one of its biggest traditional components: food stamps. It was the first time since 1973 that the nutrition program had been left out of the farm bill. Now, negotiations have started between the Senate and the House to try to reconcile the upper chamber’s more charitable version with the one the lower chamber put together. It will be a tough slog since the two bills are billions of dollars apart. The Senate wants to cut $4 billion from SNAP over 10 years, while the House wants to cut nearly $40 billion. Perhaps the most appalling thing about the farm bill presented by the ultraconservatives in the House is that it makes little pretense of cutting spending by ferreting out wastefulness or fraud, no feint at an all-out assault on the deficit. Instead, this is just a base and ugly assault on the working poor. Oh, conservatives claimed that their cuts to food stamps were in response to fraud, as their claque filled the airwaves with the same example of a carefree California surfer enjoying his “wonderful” life on food stamps. They neglected to point to government data which show that SNAP is among the most efficient of government programs, with fraudulent spending restricted to about 2 percent of its budget. Meanwhile, the same conservatives have said nothing — nothing — about the millions of dollars in fraud related to farm subsidies. A June audit by the Government Accountability Office found that millions of dollars in subsidies have been sent to farmers who’ve been dead for at least a year. That’s just the illegal stuff.

That doesn’t touch the entirely legal fraud: The entire network of agricultural subsidies is a massive boondoggle, welfare to people who hardly need it. While conservatives hector the working poor about their alleged laziness, some agricultural programs pay farmers not to plant. Why don’t Fox News and Rush Limbaugh ever talk about that? Farmers hardly need the money. (Forget about the struggling family farmer of lore. He has largely disappeared.) Earlier this year, the Agriculture Department projected that farm income in 2013 would be $128.2 billion, the highest since 1973. One of the more egregious examples of the sheer hypocrisy surrounding the debate over the farm bill was revealed by The New York Times, which wrote about U.S. Rep. Stephen Fincher, R-Tenn. He voted for the bill that eviscerates SNAP, but he received nearly $3.5 million in farm subsidies from the government between 1999 and 2012, according to the Times. “We have to remember there is not a big printing press in Washington that continually prints money over and over,” he said, apparently without irony.

Conservatives claim to be alarmed by the dramatic increase in food stamp outlays, up 77 percent since 2007 to a record high of $78.5 billion in fiscal year 2012. (The SNAP program is already scheduled for a 5 percent cut as a provision related to the 2009 stimulus bill lapses.) But that’s because so many more people are struggling to make ends meet. The Great Recession accelerated a trend that has hollowed out the middle class, leaving many Americans without college degrees in a downward spiral. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that nearly 49 million Americans are “food insecure” — bureaucratese that means they don’t have enough to eat. If we aren’t willing to see to it that they have basic nutrition, I’ll have to reconsider what I believe about my country.

(Cynthia Tucker, winner of the 2007 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, is a visiting professor at the University of Georgia. She can be reached at cynthia@cynthiatucker.com.)


COPYRIGHT 2013 CYNTHIA TUCKER

Please Donate

Please Donate


It has been my opinion for several years that  business owners and managers should have worked in an industry to run it. The Current CEO of these companies has made a joke out of 2 American icons. He has sold off parts of the business to get cash and has put no money into either business as far as store upgrades and computer systems. To top it off the long term employees who are left are primarily part time and without the pension package they worked 30 plus years for in some cases. These two institutions are being mismanaged from top to bottom with the workers and store managers taking the hit.  The article below is indicative of that.

By Ashley Lutz | Business Insider – Mon, Oct 21, 2013 8:26 AM EDT

 Sears, once America’s golden retailer, is a company in crisis. 

The company has shuttered hundreds of stores in recent years. The embattled company has been selling some its most profitable stores to raise money. 

Brian Sozzi, chief equities strategist at Belus Capital Advisors, took poignant photos inside of New Jersey  and New York Sears locations. 

“To understand why Sears is in a ‘sell stores mode’ one must look no further than the stores themselves, where the truth is to be found,” Sozzi writes. 

His photos show the sad reality of what Sears is today. 

Sears’ mannequins are outdated in comparison with competitors like Macy’s, Lord & Taylor, and JCPenney, Sozzi says. “If you are living darn near paycheck to paycheck, does this presentation excite you about making a purchase with a couple saved up electronic dollars?”

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

Sozzi points out that this display is confusing. “Huh? A random football themed carpet with no promotion around it?” he says.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

“What’s the deal in the back of this electronics department?” Sozzi asks. “Does Best Buy look like this? Or, how about the electronics sections at Wal-Mart, Target, Costco, and BJ’s Wholesale? Nope.”

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

The shoe department isn’t adequately stocked, with empty shelves.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

“The team can’t find any way to repurpose abandoned portrait studios into something that drives traffic and sales?” Sozzi asks. “The consistently dark zones give a ‘going out of business’ feel to nearby departments that actually log some sales, which include appliances and baby.”

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

Lights are out in the store. “This is not great for flattering a potential customer trying on merchandise,” Sozzi writes.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

“This is where the store underinvestment appears loud and ugly,” Sozzi says.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

“Attack of the female basics? Look at the lack of organization,” Sozzi says.sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

Associates weren’t on hand to help make purchases in this disorganized department, Sozzi says.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

These displays are almost totally empty.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

“Toys stacked on a shelf next to an escalator by the shoe department,” Sozzi writes.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

Again, Sears is disorganized. “Accessories are some of the only discretionary items selling in the mall with consistency these days,” Sozzi writes. “Best of luck navigating this flea market experience.”

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

The men’s department is overwhelming. “Inventory excess…an entire department of it!” Sozzi says. “Who is in charge of planning and allocation?”

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

The beauty department also lacks innovation in comparison with competitors. “JCPenney has Sephora. Macy’s newly remodeled stores have an array of associates at the ready to assist in cosmetics, ditto Lord & Taylor,” Sozzi says. “Ulta stores are popping up everywhere. Sears, well, yeah.”

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

“Retail is detail? Not here,” Sozzi writes.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

The random clothing racks are confusing to customers and show a lack of organization.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

This mat appears to be shabby and stained.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

Sozzi left the store with an empty cart.

sears decline

Brian Sozzi/Belus Capital Advisors

Please Donate

Please Donate