Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: February 2014


I have posted most of a recent news story about taxing soda in Illinois> My comments and those of a friend follow the excerpt.
   
”  Sen. Mattie Hunter, D-Chicago, and Rep. Robyn Gabel, D-Evanston, filed the Healthy Eating and Active Living Act in the Senate and House last week that would impose a 1-cent-per-ounce excise tax on regular and diet sodas, beverages that are less than 50 percent juice, sports drinks and ready-to-drink coffees and teas.

A Cook County Department  of Public Health study published in 2011 estimated that at current consumption levels, a penny-per-ounce excise tax on sugar-sweetened  beverages in Illinois could generate more than $600 million and cut statewide  consumption of those beverages by almost 150 million  gallons.

Other estimates in the study suggest that the tax could play a role in a reduction  of as many as 3,400 new cases of diabetes each year, saving up to $20.7 million in diabetes-related health-care costs. Obesity-related healthcare  costs could be reduced by more than $150 million.

At least half of the revenue  generated from the tax would be set aside to shore up Medicaid, which has been the victim of recent funding cuts. The other half would go to education and prevention programs that aim to curb obesity, diabetes and other illnesses.

The bill calls for the formation  of an advisory board tasked with deciding which programs would get grant money generated by the tax.

Gabel said the board would include representatives from the State Board of Education, the Illinois Department of Public Health and other health organizations.

Pass-along costs?

Since the legislation was announced Wednesday, Hunter said she’s added four chief co-sponsors to the bill in the Senate.

But as support picks up steam, business groups with ties to the beverage industry are lining up in opposition.

“We’re not just going to sit back, we’re going to be aggressively opposing the bill,” said Illinois Beverage  Association executive director Timothy Bramlet, who noted that the industry had already taken its first step in the fight by forming the Illinois Coalition Against Beverage Taxes.

The coalition argues that the added expense to distributors  would put already-thin margins in danger. In addition,  the tax would get passed along to consumers who would see a bump in shelf prices for sugar-sweetened beverages.

If fewer people decide to purchase those drinks, opponents  say producers will have no choice but to respond to a shrinking market by slashing jobs.

Bassler said the decision was made to push for an excise tax rather than a sales tax because research shows sales taxes don’t achieve the desired effect.

“One important distinction is that (the research) authors and economists articulate that a sales tax doesn’t have an impact on consumption,” she said.

One of the Cook County study’s authors, Dr. Frank Chaloupka, professor of economics  at the University of Illinois-Chicago, said, “Sales taxes aren’t really apparent to consumers” because they’re relatively low. He said that by the time consumers check out at a register, a sales tax isn’t enough to cause them to rethink the decision to buy something.

Excise taxes, on the other hand, are built into the retail price and could dissuade consumers from making the purchase in the first place, he said.

For example, under the act, a 24-pack of soda would cost an additional $2.88 — and that’s before the 6.25 percent sales tax Illinois already tacks onto soda.

Get people talking

Despite the additional revenue, agencies in line to receive grants generated by the tax wouldn’t be able to count on stable revenue year over year.

If the HEAL Act is passed into law, and if the law works as intended, consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages will fall, bringing revenue generated from the tax down with it.

Gabel said she’s prepared to tell public health personnel  that could be the case. It shouldn’t be a problem, she said, because workers in that sector have become accustomed  to such uncertainty.

“It doesn’t worry me,” Hunter said. “The more people we educate and the more they take the products out of their diet, we can focus on the folks who need the most assistance.”

Hunter said that even if the law works perfectly, some people will still drink sugarsweetened  beverages.

“That’s on them. They still have that choice,” she said.

At any rate, Hunter and Gabel expect a long and difficult fight.

“My experience with bills that have a lot of opposition is that in the first year, it’s hard to get them out of committee,”  Gabel said.

However, the effort will get people talking about the issue, she said.

“As people recognize sugarsweetened  beverages as one of the main sources of added calories and sugar in our diets, they’ll become more sensitive to it,” Gabel said. Contact Tobias Wall: 782-3095, toby.”

My comment when I passed this on:
What happens when the sales of sweetened drinks drops and the revenue is still needed for what ever purpose the taxes will be used for? Illinois doesn’t have a great track record for managing funds.

These  are comments from a friend who once lived here in Illinois along with a connection to the full article on legalized marijuana and its benefits to the communities that have legalized it.

On 2/26/2014 6:06 AM, michael abrams wrote: > What happens when the sales of sweetened drinks drops and the revenue is still needed for what ever purpose the taxes will be used for? Illinois doesn’t have a great track record for managing funds.
Start selling recreational marijuana!  Pueblo County in Colorado just announced that the two licensed stores in their jurisdiction had $1 million in sales for January.  This means about $50,000 in taxes and $70,000 in licensing fees, resulting in an extra $120,000 for the month.  Pueblo has a total yearly budget of about $165 million, and if sales continue at this rate, the two stores would generate more than $11 million for the year.
See: http://tinyurl.com/lavn9gu  or http://tinyurl.com/lgtavlc

Next comment:
 2/26/2014 9:02 AM, michael abrams wrote:
> The Illinois legislature is not smart enough to do regular stuff right , let alone anything that would work.
They’ve always been that way.  I remember that when Illinois started offering lotto/lottery tickets, there was a lot of discussion about how the extra money would go toward education, public services, blah blah.  But of course it all ended up going into a slush fund that could be used any way they wanted.  And it became a lootery rather than a lottery.
Notice that lootery was in place of lottery, this was a typo but lootery better describes the situation.
Please Donate

Please Donate


Ok, what is up with this? This is similar to the long ago German sweep of “non Aryans” and “undesirables” (even considering the strange proclivities of the Reich’s hierarchy. Is this the same as the Lunch counter sit ins? maybe. To determine who is gay what will be required? ID cards, certain clothing or some other Identifying item or marks? This is probably one of most ridiculous things I have ever  heard. As I understand it, the supporters of this law are protecting their religious rights so let” he who is without sin cast the first stone”! This a poor business model to say the least as ALL money is green and spends the same anywhere.

Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)

Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)

Arizona’s Push For Legal Discrimination Against Gays

Arizona, on the cusp of a law allowing businesses to refuse to serve gays. We’ll dive in.

Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)
Jo Beaudry holds up a sign as she joins nearly 250 gay rights supporters protesting SB1062 at the Arizona Capitol, Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, in Phoenix. The protesters gathered demanding Gov. Jan Brewer veto legislation that would allow business owners to refuse to serve gays by citing their religious beliefs. (AP)

A bunch of states are now considering – and Arizona’s state legislature has now passed – law that would allow businesses, individuals, to discriminate against gay customers on religious grounds. Deny them service. Ohio, Mississippi, Idaho, South Dakota, Tennessee and Oklahoma have all seen similar legislation introduced. But Arizona – where it all hinges now on Gov. Jan Brewer’s signature or veto – is out front. Supporters say it’s about religious liberty. Critics say its carte blanche for straight up discrimination. This hour On Point: gay rights, religious liberty and the law in Arizona.

Please Donate

Please Donate


Does anyone get the idea that we have a non viable Congress? Does anyone see the upcoming elections as another opportunity for the super rich to get a hold on the Government? We have had more than 15 plus years of influence over Government by super pacs, custom made non profits and other ancillary groups and to no good end. The only way to avoid a Government takeover by radical groups whose sole aim is do what is best for them is to vote against retention of long time servers and ultra radical new comers. We all must do our due diligence in selecting our representatives. Be wary of the “debates” and sound bites that serve only to get your attention for some actually vague issue that is unrelated to the facts but serve as precursors to the lie that follows. Remember that a known WWII tactic of telling a lie long enough so it seems like the truth-this is what caused the death of millions during that time.

Please Donate

Please Donate


The attached article caught my eye as another way to “combat obesity and related health issues, the basic premise is OK but will the overall effect cause the not obese or diabetic as much distress as the targeted subjects? It is stated in studies that the well pay for the sick (it has always been that way) but can a soft drink excise tax do the job? It will be a number of years and test cases before it becomes law but during that time will any REAL data emerge that would encourage the at risk to do something on their own after all these “soft” drinks and their contents are as addictive as any illegal consumables
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Time right for soda tax, proponents say
Business groups vow to fight it
By Tobias Wall
State Capitol Bureau
The head of a public health advocacy group says now’s the right time to push again for a state tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, even though similar efforts have failed and even though proponents face a fight from business groups.

Illinois Public Health Institute CEO Elissa Bassler said last week that after years of research and discussion, “it seemed like it was reasonable to have legislation introduced.”
“We got a lot of positive feedback from legislators this year so we wanted to
move forward,” she said.
Sen. Mattie Hunter, D-Chicago, and Rep. Robyn Gabel, D-Evanston, filed the Healthy Eating and Active Living Act in the Senate and House last week that would impose a 1-cent-per-ounce excise tax on regular and diet sodas, beverages that are less than 50 percent juice, sports drinks and ready-to-drink coffees and teas.
A Cook County Department of Public Health study published in 2011 estimated that at current consumption levels, a penny-per-ounce excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Illinois could generate more than $600 million and cut statewide consumption of those beverages by almost 150 million gallons.

Other estimates in the study suggest that the tax could play a role in a reduction of as many as 3,400 new cases of diabetes each year, saving up to $20.7 million in diabetes-related health-care costs. Obesity-related healthcare costs could be reduced by more than $150 million.
At least half of the revenue generated from the tax would be set aside to shore up Medicaid, which has been the victim of recent funding cuts. The other half would go to education and prevention programs that aim to curb obesity, diabetes and other illnesses.
The bill calls for the formation of an advisory board tasked with deciding which programs would get grant money generated by the tax.
Gabel said the board would include representatives from the State Board of Education, the Illinois Department of Public Health and other health organizations.
Pass-along costs?
Since the legislation was announced Wednesday, Hunter said she’s added four chief co-sponsors to the bill in the Senate.
but as support picks up steam, business groups with ties to the beverage industry are lining up in opposition.
“We’re not just going to sit back, we’re going to be aggressively opposing the bill,” said Illinois Beverage Association executive director Timothy Bramlet, who noted that the industry had already taken its first step in the fight by forming the Illinois Coalition Against Beverage Taxes.
The coalition argues that the added expense to distributors would put already-thin margins in danger. In addition, the tax would get passed along to consumers who would see a bump in shelf prices for sugar-sweetened beverages.
If fewer people decide to purchase those drinks, opponents say producers will have no choice but to respond to a shrinking market by slashing jobs.
Bassler said the decision was made to push for an excise tax rather than a sales tax because research shows sales taxes don’t achieve the desired effect.
“One important distinction is that (the research) authors and economists articulate that a sales tax doesn’t have an impact on consumption,” she said.
One of the Cook County study’s authors, Dr. Frank Chaloupka, professor of economics at the University of Illinois-Chicago, said, “Sales taxes aren’t really apparent to consumers” because they’re relatively low. He said that by the time consumers check out at a register, a sales tax isn’t enough to cause them to rethink the decision to buy something.
Excise taxes, on the other hand, are built into the retail price and could dissuade consumers from making the purchase in the first place, he said.
For example, under the act, a 24-pack of soda would cost an additional $2.88 — and that’s before the 6.25 percent sales tax Illinois already tacks onto soda.
Get people talking
Despite the additional revenue, agencies in line to receive grants generated by the tax wouldn’t be able to count on stable revenue year over year.
If the HEAL Act is passed into law, and if the law works as intended, consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages will fall, bringing revenue generated from the tax down with it.
Gabel said she’s prepared to tell public health personnel that could be the case. It shouldn’t be a problem, she said, because workers in that sector have become accustomed to such uncertainty.
“It doesn’t worry me,” Hunter said. “The more people we educate and the more they take the products out of their diet, we can focus on the folks who need the most assistance.”
Hunter said that even if the law works perfectly, some people will still drink sugarsweetened beverages.
“That’s on them. They still have that choice,” she said.
At any rate, Hunter and Gabel expect a long and difficult fight.
“My experience with bills that have a lot of opposition is that in the first year, it’s hard to get them out of committee,” Gabel said.
However, the effort will get people talking about the issue, she said.
“As people recognize sugarsweetened beverages as one of the main sources of added calories and sugar in our diets, they’ll become more sensitive to it,”

Gabel said. Contact Tobias Wall: 782-3095, toby.wall@sj-r.com, twitter.com/reTcWall


 Quick food ideas
                                                   

            

Foods You Didn’t Know You Could Fry

     Here’s a harsh truth: Ain’t no amount of expertly-massaged kale gonna be tastier than a French fry. Fries are sinfully scrumptious because they’re just that—sinful. Also, deep-fried in oil. What’s better than that?

Well, don’t tell your nutritionist, but you can fry kale—and a host of other “healthy” foods, too. Here are some of our faves:

1. Chickpeas

Chickpeas get wonderfully crunchy after about five minutes in 355 degree oil. This version is zinged up with smoked paprika and a burst of lemon zest.

2. Kale

You can go the Guy Fieri route and deep-fry shreds of the stuff—Pete Wells be damned, it sounds amazing—or pan-fry a mound of it with a heck of a lot of garlic. Only sticking a pinkie toe into the deep-fried waters? Dig into a kale stir fry loaded with garlic, tofu, and julienned red peppers.

3. Avocados

Expertly done, a fried slice of avocado is creamy on the inside and crunchy on the outside. Dunked in some lime-sriracha mayo, it is positively divine.

4. Broccoli

Say goodbye to sad stalks of steamed broccoli and hello to the golden, tempura-crusted broccoli at No. 7 in Brooklyn. “Once fried, the top portion of each floret becomes soft and doughy on the inside, like a moist, savory doughnut,” cooed Slate’s L.V. Anderson. “While the florets become meltingly tender, the stalks just steam through, retaining some of their crunch.” We can get down with that.

5. Ramen

Ah, the ramen burger. Testament to the notion that if there is a will to fry something, there is a way. Chef Keizo Shimamoto ignited a certifiable craze last year when he debuted the above burger, sandwiched between two fried ramen patties. Here’s how to make your own.

OK, you caught us; ramen isn’t exactly health food. But nearly everything is healthy… in moderation. You don’t want to turn healthy things into unhealthy things every day.

But once in a while, it’s fine—nay, vital—to treat yo’ self.

Please Donate

Please Donate


Recent airings of professional athletes “coming out” seems to be big news. There is no reason that I see for all of the coverage. These folks are no different than anyone else except that their sexual orientation is not main stream (what ever that means). That difference  should not be considered a difference as  many of us serve, work and live along side members of the LGBT segment of society and have no clue about them beyond “water cooler” conversation. Think about how many celebrities and other high profile people have “come out” to the shock and amazement of the public as a whole. What if all of us took the position to accept each person on their individual merit as opposed to their sexual orientation, race, religion or ethnicity -Wow! what a concept!! The people who are unwilling to accept anyone different are usually the flawed ones and unfortunately some are excellent persuaders in hate and deception (kind of sounds like a major legislative branch). The majority of us “mainstreamers” (99%) have no issue with one another and are able to see through the smoke and mirrors of  aired hate and subterfuge so it is left to us to unite with all and any like minded people (whoever they are) and continue to make the efforts for change in our society thereby affecting a change in our government.

Please Donate

Please Donate


I have been pondering this post for a while and seeking to insure the idea of it is a pure as I can make it.

Years ago a well respected National organization was founded on premise of providing public service to non white Americans. That was the beginning of the Urban League. This is the brief story of their history.

“Our Mission

The mission of the Urban League movement is to enable African Americans to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

Our History
The National Urban League, which has played so pivotal a role in the 20th-Century Freedom Movement, grew out of that spontaneous grassroots movement for freedom and opportunity that came to be called the Black Migrations. When the U.S. Supreme Court declared its approval of segregation in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision, the brutal system of economic, social and political oppression the White South quickly adopted rapidly transformed what had been a trickle of African Americans northward into a flood.

Those newcomers to the North soon discovered they had not escaped racial discrimination. Excluded from all but menial jobs in the larger society, victimized by poor housing and education, and inexperienced in the ways of urban living, many lived in terrible social and economic conditions.

Still, in the degree of difference between South and North lay opportunity, and that African Americans clearly understood. But to capitalize on that opportunity, to successfully adapt to urban life and to reduce the pervasive discrimination they faced, they would need help. That was the reason the Committee on Urban Conditions Among Negroes was established on September 29, 1910 in New York City. Central to the organization’s founding were two remarkable people: Mrs. Ruth Standish Baldwin and Dr. George Edmund Haynes, who would become the Committee’s first executive secretary.

Mrs. Baldwin, the widow of a railroad magnate and a member of one of America’s oldest families, had a remarkable social conscience and was a stalwart champion of the poor and disadvantaged. Dr. Haynes, a graduate of Fisk University, Yale University, and Columbia University (he was the first African American to receive a doctorate from that institution), felt a compelling need to use his training as a social worker to serve his people.
A year later, the Committee merged with the Committee for the Improvement of Industrial Conditions Among Negroes in New York (founded in New York in 1906), and the National League for the Protection of Colored Women (founded in 1905) to form the National League on Urban Conditions Among Negroes. In 1920, the name was later shortened to the National Urban League.

The interracial character of the League’s board was set from its first days. Professor Edwin R. A. Seligman of Columbia University, one of the leaders in progressive social service activities in New York City, served as chairman from 1911 to 1913. Mrs. Baldwin took the post until 1915.

The fledgling organization counseled black migrants from the South, helped train black social workers, and worked in various other ways to bring educational and employment opportunities to blacks. Its research into the problems blacks faced in employment opportunities, recreation, housing, health and sanitation, and education spurred the League’s quick growth. By the end of World War I the organization had 81 staff members working in 30 cities.

In 1918, Dr. Haynes was succeeded by Eugene Kinckle Jones who would direct the agency until his retirement in 1941. Under his direction, the League significantly expanded its multifaceted campaign to crack the barriers to black employment, spurred first by the boom years of the 1920s, and then, by the desperate years of the Great Depression. Efforts at reasoned persuasion were buttressed by boycotts against firms that refused to employ blacks, pressures on schools to expand vocational opportunities for young people, constant prodding of Washington officials to include blacks in New Deal recovery programs and a drive to get blacks into previously segregated labor unions.

As World War II loomed, Lester Granger, a seasoned League veteran and crusading newspaper columnist, was appointed Eugene Kinckle Jones successor.

Outspoken in his commitment to advancing opportunity for blacks, Granger pushed tirelessly to integrate the racist trade unions and led the League’s effort to support A. Philip Randolph’s March on Washington Movement to fight discrimination in defense work and in the armed services. Under Granger, the League, through its own Industrial Relations Laboratory, had notable success in cracking the color bar in numerous defense plants. The nation’s demand for civilian labor during the war also helped the organization press ahead with greater urgency its programs to train black youths for meaningful blue-collar employment. After the war those efforts expanded to persuading Fortune 500 companies to hold career conferences on the campuses of Negro colleges and place blacks in upper-echelon jobs.

Of equal importance to the League’s own future sources of support, Granger avidly supported the organization of its volunteer auxiliary, the National Urban League Guild, which, under the leadership of Mollie Moon, became an important national force in its own right.

The explosion of the civil rights movement provoked a change for the League, one personified by its new leader, Whitney M. Young, Jr., who became executive director in 1961. A social worker like his predecessors, he substantially expanded the League’s fund-raising ability and, most critically, made the League a full partner in the civil rights movement. Although the League’s tax-exempt status barred it from protest activities, it hosted at its New York headquarters the planning meetings of A. Philip Randolph, Martin Luther King, Jr., and other civil rights leaders for the 1963 March on Washington. Young was also a forceful advocate for greater government and private-sector efforts to eradicate poverty. His call for a domestic Marshall Plan, a ten-point program designed to close the huge social and economic gap between black and white Americans, significantly influenced the discussion of the Johnson Administration’s War on Poverty legislation.

Young’s tragic death in 1971 in a drowning incident off the coast of Lagos, Nigeria brought another change in leadership. Vernon E. Jordan, Jr., formerly Executive Director of the United Negro College Fund, took over as the League’s fifth Executive Director in 1972 (the title of the office was changed to President in 1977). For the next decade, until his resignation in December 1981, Jordan skillfully guided the League to new heights of achievement. He oversaw a major expansion of its social service efforts, as the League became a significant conduit for the federal government to establish programs and deliver services to aid urban communities, and brokered fresh initiatives in such League programs as housing, health, education and minority business development. Jordan also instituted a citizenship education program that helped increase the black vote and brought new programs to such areas as energy, the environment, and non-traditional jobs for women of color-and he developed The State of Black America report.

In 1982, John E. Jacob, a former chief executive officer of the Washington, D.C. and San Diego affiliates who had served as Executive Vice President, took the reins of leadership, solidifying the League’s internal structure and expanding its outreach even further.

Jacob established the Permanent Development Fund in order to increase the organization’s financial stamina. In honor of Whitney Young, he established several programs to aid the development of those who work for and with the League: The Whitney M. Young, Jr. Training Center, to provide training and leadership development opportunities for both staff and volunteers; the Whitney M. Young, Jr. Race Relations Program, which recognizes affiliates doing exemplary work in race relations; and the Whitney M. Young, Jr. Commemoration Ceremony, which honors and pays tribute to long term staff and volunteers who have made extraordinary contributions to the Urban League Movement.

Jacob established the League’s NULITES youth development program and spurred the League to put new emphasis on programs to reduce teenage pregnancy, help single female heads of households, combat crime in black communities, and increase voter registration.

Hugh B. Price, appointed to the League’s top office in July 1994, took over the reins at a critical moment for the League, for black America, and for the nation as a whole. In the early 90’s, the fierce market-driven dynamic of “globalization,” was sweeping the world, fundamentally altering the economic relations among and within countries and reshaping the link between the nation’s citizenry and its economy, fostering enormous uncertainty among individuals and tensions among ethnic and cultural groups.

This economic change and the efforts of some to rollback the gains African Americans fashioned since the 1960s made the League’s efforts all the more necessary. Price, a lawyer with extensive experience in community development and public policy issues, intensified the organization’s work in three broad areas: in education and youth development, individual and community-wide economic empowerment, affirmative action and the promotion of inclusion as a critical foundation for securing America’s future as a multi-ethnic democracy.

Among Price’s most notable achievements was establishing the League’s Institute of Opportunity and Equality in Washington, DC, which conducted research and public policy analysis of urban issues and the Campaign for African American Achievement, a community mobilization and advocacy initiative created to raise awareness and promote the importance of achievement through the formation of the National Achievers Society, “Doing the Right Thing” recognition in local communities and the National Urban League’s Scholarship Program.

On May 15, 2003 the Board of Trustees of the National Urban League voted overwhelmingly to appoint former New Orleans Mayor Marc H. Morial as the League’s eighth President and Chief Executive Officer. As New Orleans Chief Executive, he was one of the most popular and effective mayors in the city’s history, leaving office with 70% approval rating. After being elected as one of the youngest mayors in the city’s history, crime plummeted by 60% a corrupt Police Department was reformed, new programs for youth were started and stagnant economy was reignited.

Since his appointment to the National Urban League, Morial has worked to reenergize the movement’s diverse constituencies by building on the strengths of the NUL’s 95-year-old legacy and increasing the organization’s profile both locally and nationally.

In his first year, Morial worked to streamline the organization’s headquarters, secured over $10 million dollars in new funding to support affiliate programs, created the first Legislative Policy Conference “NUL on the Hill’, revamped the State of Black America report, created profitability for the annual conference, and secured a $127.5 million equity fund for minority businesses through the new markets tax credit program. He introduced and developed a stronger strategic direction of the organization with a “five point empowerment agenda’ that focuses on closing the equality gaps which exist for African Americans and other emerging ethnic communities in education, economic empowerment, health and quality of life, civic engagement and civil rights and racial justice.”

This is the guiding principle of the Urban league and its many offices throughout the country or is it? The Local branch (Springfield Illinois) has apparently lost sight of what the Urban league is about. This branch has been the administrator for the Head Start program in Springfield and as such has through several CEO’s made some grave errors in judgment and administration. The current administration while not necessarily being the worst or the best has demonstrated a  lack of concern for the Clients in their charges under the Head Start program. In the last 5 years the (Head Start)program has deteriorated to a shell of its former status. The Springfield Urban league has reduced the teaching staff by 50 plus teachers, aides and advocates due to the desire and successful election of a Union for by the  staff. The SUL with no regard for the long range effect and detriment of the clients (Children and their parents) has reduced staff, fought the Union on contracts and harassed the Unionized staff to the point that many feel threatened on a daily basis in spite of Union protection. The cloud of despair that hangs over the Head Start program is visible and palpable yet no one reports on it. There have been Op-eds extolling the great achievements of SUL but these writings are by uninformed, under informed or spoon fed information. The real truth can only be gleaned from the Union and the folks under that Union not from someone being fed the fodder of misinformation that the League wants put out to the public. If the time were taken by some adventurous media type the truth while being out there could be brought forth in a better way than I can here.


This article caught my eye and I have copied it in full ( I hope):

Listen up, ladies: more women are entering an exciting field once dominated by men that’s full of excitement, danger, and cash paydays: bank robbing. One out of every 14 bank robbers in the U.S. last year was a woman, according to the F.B.I., and their numbers are rising. The “Beauty Salon Bandit” and mother of three robbed banks in New Jersey, the “Starlet Bandit” struck five Los Angeles banks in just a week, and two 18-year-old strip club workers dubbed the “Barbie Bandits” knocked over a bank in Georgia. The face of bank robbery may have changed since the Great Depression, when famous desperadoes like John Dillinger and Willie Sutton terrorized banks across the nation, but there were still more than 5,000 bank heists in 2011, netting over $38 million, up from just 857 heists in 1965. But before you get any ideas, remember that robbing banks has never been a dumber idea. Thanks to alarm systems, security cameras, and exploding dye packs hidden in wads of bills, it’s harder than ever to get away with. More than half of bank robbers are either nabbed at the scene, or arrested after police look at footage from security cameras. Even when robbers do get away with it, the average booty is only around 10,000 dollars. Not much, when you consider the punishment can be 20 years or more in the slammer. Robbers that score a big haul, and get away with it, are a dying breed. One who did was Victor Manuel Gerena, still on the F.B.I.’s Ten Most Wanted list after he single-handedly stole $7 million dollars from a Wells Fargo armored truck depot in 1983, then disappeared. The kind of tale that leads desperate men — and more and more women — to think they can get away with it, too. It is important to remember that  the economy has an effect on  crime by bringing desperate people into the field. The existing criminals will continue to do what they have been doing all along and occasionally band together to do something big.

Please Donate

Please Donate

.


I ran across this article and felt it should be addressed again.

Another Reason to Stop Eating Processed Foods or eat less and avoid reheating in plastic containers (even the plastic lined ones).
Rachel Tepper
Feb 20, 2014

It’s hardly news that most processed foods aren’t great for you. Grocery shelves are lined with products low in vitamins and minerals that are pumped with harmful fats and huge amounts of sodium. But have you ever considered their packaging? According to a growing number of environmental scientists, you should.

Commentary recently published in the “Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health” suggests that various chemicals used in the packaging, storage, and processing of everyday foods could be seriously detrimental to your health after years of exposure. We asked Sonya Lunder, a senior analyst at the Environmental Working Group, to explain.

“The big picture takeaway is that our food is coming packaged in a variety of materials, and things like plastic can contain five to 30 chemicals or components,” Lunder said. “A lot of these chemicals, the ones we know of, are chemicals that are concerning to human health. But [they’re] also subtle—a lot of these exposures go relatively unnoticed.”
Here are a few products that have Lunder and other scientists concerned:
1. Canned Foods
“Nearly every canned food that you buy in the United States right now is lined with BPA,” Lunder said. “And that has been found in tests to be leaching into foods.”
BPA, or bisphenol A, is used in products that prevent rusting, giving it a longer shelf life. But the substance itself behaves like estrogen and has been found to disrupt hormones in laboratory animals. It can alter the fetal development of reproductive systems and the brain, and may increase the risk of breast and prostate cancer. It’s also suspected of increasing one’s likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes.
2. Microwaved Plastic Containers
You should probably stop microwaving those plastic Chinese takeout containers. According to Lunder, heating plastic may change its molecular bonds, allowing whatever chemicals in it to leach into food. And don’t be fooled by “microwave-safe” plastics—that usually just means that the container won’t melt while it’s zapped.
“I don’t think it’s possible to make plastic that won’t leach at all in the microwave,” Lunder said. “I suggest only microwaving in glass.”
3. Microwavable Popcorn Bags
Those bags of Orville Redenbacher and other popcorn brands are lined with fluoride-based chemicals that prevent the oil from seeping into the paper, Lunder said. When microwaved, they could seep into your food.
4. Lids of Glass Jars
The lids of many commercially-processed glass jars are lined with BPA to prevent the metal from rusting. Lunden said many of these jars are heated and sealed to sterilize them, which could cause BPA to seep into the product.
But Lunden says the answer isn’t simply stop using these products, which are ubiquitous. “It’s not effective and it’s not going to be possible,” she explained. Consumers need to demand that companies rethink their packaging. It’s worked before—in 2008, the water bottle company Nalgene stopped using a BPA-laden plastic after a public uproar.
“I think [this issue is] outrageous and an uproar is justifiable,” Lunden said. “But there’s a reason these problems are going undetected—we’re not looking.”

 

Please Donate

Please Donate


My dear friend Bob Newman passed away last evening. Bob had been ill for some time and has at last found peace. Bob was my neighbor and friend for the past 10 years or so. When I moved to Springfield, my house was around the corner from Bob and we shared a common fence line. We would chat from time to time when we were out doing yard chores. This was a very comfortable relationship and I will miss him. I had several opportunities to assist Bob and Sara in doing some small repairs around their home and chatted with Bob each time. The one thing I remember about Bob is his statement when I said hello old man: His reply was ” my dad Made me a New Man” (Newman). Now I believe Bob is a New Man.