Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: March 2016


 This post from “The Rude pundit” is indeed Rude an coarse however to keep it in context I have altered some words. And as an add of my opinion,: perhaps the “Justice” will answer to a higher Justice.
 
 
 3/03/2016

Samuel Alito: Supreme Dick (A Short One)

Yesterday’s Supreme Court hearing was on the insultingly dumb Texas law requiring family planning clinics where abortions are performed to meet rigid standards that virtually no other medical clinic where outpatient procedures are done must meet. The three women justices kicked so much ass that asses miles away felt it. Justices Ginsberg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, along with liberal male Justice Breyer, were all over Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller, taking apart the absurdity of his argument that the closure of all but 10 clinics in the entirety of Texas wasn’t an “undue burden” on the women of the huge fucking state.

Of course, back on the conservative side, Clarence Thomas didn’t say a goddamned thing, having gone back into a decade-long hibernation, like a particularly dumb and cruel cicada. Anthony Kennedy was at his weaselly peak in figuring out how not to make a decision. And John Roberts attempted to undo the arguments of clinics’ attorney Stephanie Toti. The ghost of Antonin Scalia was screaming from Hell.

But the king dickhead of the day was Samuel Alito, the bespectacled worm of the court. Alito took it upon himself to try to get Toti to admit that the clinics didn’t close because of the law. This mattered to him more than the lives of the women or the distance they had to travel or the money they had to spend or anything else, even though he was utterly f**king wrong:

JUSTICE ALITO: Well, there is very little specific evidence in the record in this case with respect to why any particular clinic closed. Basically, your argument is that the law took effect, and after that point, there was a decrease in the number of clinics…As to how many, of the total that you claim closed, do you have direct evidence about the reason for the closure?

MS. TOTI: Well, 11 of them, Your Honor, closed on the day that the admitting privileges took effect.

JUSTICE ALITO: Yeah. And as to how many…how many are you claiming total closed as a result of the law?

MS. TOTI: To…to date, roughly 20 clinics have closed.

JUSTICE ALITO: And of the 20, how…as to how many do you have direct evidence?

MS. TOTI: I…approximately 12, Your Honor, direct evidence.

JUSTICE ALITO: Because if…if you go through this ­­now we’re not talking about a huge number of facilities.

A few minutes later, Justice Kagan punched Alito right in the nutsack when she said, “Is it right that in the two­-week period that the ASC requirement was in effect, that over a dozen facilities shut their doors, and then when that was stayed, when that was lifted, they reopened again immediately?” Toti said that was true. Kagan then put mighty fist to tiny balls as she concluded, “It’s almost like the perfect controlled experiment as to the effect of the law, isn’t it? It’s like you put the law into effect, 12 clinics closed. You take the law out of effect, they reopen?”

Who knows how this will go at this point. But, obviously, there could be a law called “Keep That F**kin’ Baby, Whore of Babylon” and Alito would justify it somehow.

– See more at: http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2016/03/samuel-alito-supreme-dick-short-one.html#sthash.Er0p9Osn.dpuf

Please Donate

Please Donate


The ongoing Bill Cosby sexual allegations and public trail by media is not over but could be if the attorneys would get their acts together. At this time most people who follow this are at once surprised, amazed or not. The Many accusations have so many flaws or possible misconceptions as to muddy the waters on the real story. It appears that many well known personalities (including Mrs., Bill Cosby)are being deposed on their knowledge of his actions. I am concerned about the time span between the actual occurrence of the supposed acts and the current revelations. It may turn out to be true or not but the media frenzy has more to do with selling papers or air time than facts. We expect this type of coverage from the checkout stand journals rather than the mainstream media but it appears that any method of increasing revenue is fair game even if it may turn out to false. This is not to say that Mr. Cosby is innocent or guilty but a fair shake should be available for all  as this could happen to any of us for any supposed transgressions from the past.

Please Donate

Please Donate


Recently I have spoken with relatives, friends and associates who were training for various professional fields where additional licensing or testing was required for the State in which they live. Each one has told the same story: the required reading in preparation to take the necessary test for Accreditation was not quite like the exam. It appears that the wording is a bit different in the actual exam or perhaps even different. Bear in mind that each test has a cost to take and some charge a retake fee,  often the testing agency is a contract vendor (supposedly  to give an air of neutrality to the government body). Given that the months and years of training required for these professions why is it that these States make this accreditation exam just different or hard enough that a extremely small margin could create a retake situation. It is well known that some folks are not great at taking tests but know their subject well. It appears to me that the reasonable way to do this would be to have the exam wording reflect  the actual training or reading materials as  related to the subject matter. This may never happen but wouldn’t you think that States would rather have people who have to pay the professional fees, pay those fees for the many years that they will pay them than have that person dump the training because of a flawed testing system which requires payment for retakes on possibly flawed testing material?

Please Donate

Please Donate