Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: March 2013


Help me continue to publish

Help me continue to publish

This was forwarded to me, Now to you.
— On Thu, 3/21/13, Tyler Perry Mailing List <mailinglist@tylerperry.com> wrote:Subject: We Can Do Better!

Hey guys,

A couple of days ago a storm came through here that was crazy. I’ve never seen that much hail and rain.  It reminded me of when I was living in my old house. Every time there was a bad storm I had to go through some major things to get the lights back on in the house. One time there was a storm so bad that lightning hit the house and all the power went out. I looked across the street and my neighbor had power, so I knew the problem was just in my house.
Stay with me, I’m going somewhere here…
I knew I had to get to the circuit breaker to fix what was going on. Now, in my old house, the breaker box was in the attic, and in order to get to it I had to climb a ladder, go up a flight of stairs and then climb over an air conditioning unit, all the while trying to not step through the ceiling joist or I would go straight through the sheet rock. And imagine trying to do all of this in the dark. But I had to do it if I wanted lights on in my house.
I got to the breaker box and started turning the breakers back on. For those of you who are not up on your DIY (do it yourself, LOL), the circuit breakers protect the house from further damage by turning themselves off if they get too much power or pull too much power to them.
As I was thinking about this yesterday I started thinking about us as people, as souls… me, you and any other human on this planet. What is common about us all is that we all, at one time or another, will go through or have been through a storm, and sometimes the storms are so bad that they turn off circuit breakers in our lives. We can look at others who have gone through the same storm and they are fine, like my neighbor across the street. They had power, but I was in the dark. Same storm, but it affected me differently. Many people can have the same experience and get over it but it affects each of us differently. Never let someone tell you to just get over it because they did. It’s not that simple.
When circuit breakers shut down in our lives they usually turn off to protect us from trauma, but just because they turn off doesn’t mean that they are supposed to stay off. A lot of times we leave them off because we don’t want to do all that is necessary to reach the breaker box to turn them back on. So what happens? We begin to live a life that is not as bright and fulfilling as it was originally designed to be. You just stay in the dark because it’s easier to not go through what you need to go through for healing. Trust me, I’ve been there, lived there for a while until I realized that I wanted all the lights on in my soul. I had to get these breakers back on.
Why am I saying this to you? Well I know that God designed all of us to live the fullest life that we can, to live in the light, love and joy. It is my hope and prayer today that you will start to do the work to turn on some of the breakers that may have been turned off in your life by difficult moments. What do I mean by that? If you have a dream and you stopped dreaming because it got too hard, that’s a breaker that went off. Turn it back on. If you decided that you wouldn’t love anyone else because you’ve been hurt, that’s a breaker that’s been turned off. Turn it back on. If you have decided to give up on life because nothing seems to go right, that’s a breaker that went off. Turn it back on. If you have given up on your kids because they won’t do the right thing, that’s a breaker that went off. Turn it back on.
You see what I mean? Go through your life and look at all the people who have hurt you. Look at all the situations that have left you in the dark. Turn those breakers back on. Live in a full house. One of my favorite scriptures says, “Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father, which is in heaven.”  Light up your soul!


All of us have had to or complain about something. There is a way to complain. The first thing is do not complain when angry, second have your facts straight, third have an alternative solution. While none or any of these things may change the status quo but you can at least get your issue out there. (I blog). It is all too easy to assume (remember assume makes an ass out of you and me) that you have a better way or can do better. It is harder to bring a possibly viable solution to the subject. There are people in every company of any size whose sole job is to assess the company functions and create when needed better ways to do business. These folks do not always get it right but since they have a trusted position, they are more likely to be taken seriously than you so you have been diplomatic in your approach ( I haven’t always been). The basic premise sometimes is that you have a better idea and it isn’t necessarily or their idea is better yet isn’t always. What happens too often anymore with companies who modernize or streamline is they many times try to reinvent the wheel instead of figuring out how to reduce the rolling resistance.

 

 

 

 

 

Please Donate

Please Donate


Please Donate

Please Donate

 

Franklin Roosevelt said “we have nothing to fear but fear itself”, This is not the entire quote and it’s related content but unfortunately we do have something to fear. What we have to be completely fearful of are the firmly entrenched 535 members of Congress who by their stubborn adherence to political malfeasance in the guise of Legislating have put us in a war we could not hope to win, an economic morass that we cannot hope to get out of without some tough choices. All the while they have protected their wages,pensions and health care. This unfortunately is not an isolated case, we have the same events occurring in every state and many communities. The people we voted in office have failed to do anything related to problem solving but still draw the salaries and benefits they so richly do not deserve. We as voters have allowed our legislators and public administrators to do what we were led to believe was correct and prudent. It is apparent to me that our faith in the government as a whole is a mistake. Our needs are for elected officials who will do the work required for what we as voters consider correct pay and benefits not what they surreptitiously give themselves. When we (their bosses) decide we have has enough then we will begin to un elect these losers so we can win for a change.


Why is that elected officials at all levels are good at creating ways to pay for services by raising fees and taxes  yet never reduce their own incomes from the jobs? A case could be made that they pay those same fees and taxes but do we know for sure? I would like to believe that they do but with politics being the ruin of many, that belief is hard to come by. There is no doubt that the cost of everything has risen due to a number of factors (greed being one) but there are still many areas where the previous funding was ill-used or outright stolen. We have multinational companies who have outsourced us into poverty while pocketing big profits. We have investment agents and their companies who do not have enough common decency to consider the effect of their greed on their neighbors, friends and family. With all of the recent and near recent turmoil created by the past administration along with the high placed hangers on, you would think that the still sitting Legislature would attempt to clean up their act but such is not the case. What appears to be the norm is “wait a while and people will forget”.  We should never forget that we elected them and we and only we can get them out. Disregard their homilies and rhetoric as they all turn out be lies, even the most honest of elected officials fudge some but not to the extent that we have seen in the past 20 years. I ask that everyone pay particular attention to the promises made during election and the reality of what is possible. We have endured a war in the 60’s and 90’s along with several excursions sprinkled in, with a net loss of lives and money for the country as a whole. Now today we still have the political factions moving at breakneck speed to continue their misaligned actions. The end result is a United States that is fractured and in need of good leadership. The only way to get is  read, listen and vote.

 

Please Donate

Please Donate


All of you read my blog, I am requesting that you please comment good or bad

Thanks

 

 

 

Help me continue to publish

Help me continue to publish


Please Donate

Please Donate

I recently received an e mail about using drugs prescription and OTC after the expiration date. After reading the email, I began the search for answers. I checked Snopes, nothing there, I checked WEB Md, Nothing there. I went to the Harvard Medical school website and found this information. Keep in mind if a medication has an odd smell, looks funny or anyway different from when you bought it then Do Not Use! The e mail is first then the Harvard study.

See Harvard Med School study:
Very interesting and something I’ve been concerned about It is good that someone did all this research.
DOES THE EXPIRATION DATE ON A BOTTLE OF MEDICATION HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANCE?
If a bottle of Tylenol, for example, has a label reading “Do not use after June 1998,” and it’s August 2002, should you take the Tylenol? Should you discard it? Can you get hurt if you take it? Will it simply have lost its potency and do you no good? In other words, are drug manufacturers being honest with us when they put an expiration date on their medications, or is the practice of dating just another drug industry scam to get us to buy new medications when the old ones that purportedly have “expired” are still perfectly good?
These are the pressing questions I investigated after my mother-in-law recently said to me, “It doesn’t mean anything,” when I pointed out that the Tylenol she was about to take had “expired” 4 years and a few months ago. I was a bit mocking in my pronouncement — feeling superior that I had noticed the chemical corpse in her cabinet — but she was equally adamant in her reply, and is generally very sage about medical issues.
So I gave her a glass of water with the purportedly “dead” drug, of which she took 2 capsules for a pain in the upper back. About a half hour later she reported the pain seemed to have eased up a bit. I said, “You could be having a placebo effect,” not wanting to simply concede she was right about the drug, and also not actually knowing what I was talking about. I was just happy to hear that her pain had eased, even before we had our evening cocktails and hot tub dip (we were in “Leisure World,” near Laguna Beach , California , where the hot tub is bigger than most Manhattan apartments, and “Heaven,” as generally portrayed, would be raucous by comparison).
Upon my return to NYC and high-speed connection, I immediately scoured the medical databases and general literature for the answer to my question about drug expiration labeling. And voila, no sooner than I could say “Screwed again by the pharmaceutical industry,” I had my answer.
Here are the simple facts:  First , the expiration date, required by law in the United States beginning in 1979, specifies only the date the manufacturer guarantees the full potency and safety of the drug — it does not mean how long the drug is actually “good” or safe to use.
Second, medical authorities uniformly say it is safe to take drugs past their expiration date — no matter how “expired” the drugs purportedly are. Except for possibly the rarest of exceptions, you won’t get hurt and you certainly won’t get killed. Studies show that expired drugs may lose some of their potency over time, from as little as 5% or less to 50% or more (though usually much less than the latter). Even 10 years after the “expiration date,” most drugs have a good deal of their original potency.
One of the largest studies ever conducted that supports the above points about “expired drug” labeling was done by the US military 15 years ago, according to a feature story in the Wall Street Journal (March 29, 2000), reported by Laurie P. Cohen.
The military was sitting on a $1 billion stockpile of drugs and facing the daunting process of destroying and replacing its supply every 2 to 3 years, so it began a testing program to see if it could extend the life of its inventory.
The testing, conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), ultimately covered more than 100 drugs, prescription and over-the-counter. The results showed, about 90% of them were safe and effective as far as 15 years past their expiration date. In light of these results, a former director of the testing program, Francis Flaherty, said he concluded that expiration dates put on by manufacturers typically have no bearing on whether a drug is usable for longer.  Mr. Flaherty noted that a drug maker is required to prove only that a drug is still good on whatever expiration date the company chooses to set. The expiration date doesn’t mean, or even suggest, that the drug will stop being effective after that, nor that it will become harmful.
“Manufacturers put expiration dates on for marketing, rather than scientific reasons, ” said Mr. Flaherty, a pharmacist at the FDA until his retirement in 1999.  “It’s not profitable for them to have products on a shelf for 10 years. They want turnover.”
The FDA cautioned there isn’t enough evidence from the program, which is weighted toward drugs used during combat, to conclude most drugs in consumers’ medicine cabinets are potent beyond the expiration date.
Joel Davis, however, a former FDA expiration-date compliance chief, said that with a handful of exceptions — notably nitroglycerin, insulin, and some liquid antibiotics — most drugs are probably as durable as those the agency has tested for the military.
“Most drugs degrade very slowly,” he said. “In all likelihood, you can take a product you have at home and keep it for many years.” Consider aspirin. Bayer AG puts 2-year or 3-year dates on aspirin and says that it should be discarded after that. However, Chris Allen, a vice president at the Bayer unit that makes aspirin, said the dating is “pretty conservative”. When Bayer has tested 4-year-old aspirin, it remained 100% effective, he said. So why doesn’t Bayer set a 4-year expiration date? Because the company often changes packaging, and it undertakes “continuous improvement programs,” Mr. Allen said. Each change triggers a need for more expiration-date testing, and testing each time for a 4-year life would be impractical. Bayer has never tested aspirin beyond 4 years, Mr. Allen said. But Jen s Carstensen has.
Dr. Carstensen, professor emeritus at the University of Wisconsin ‘s pharmacy school, who wrote what is considered the main text on drug stability, said…”I did a study of different aspirins, and after 5 years, Bayer was still excellent.
Aspirin, if made correctly, is very stable. “Okay, I concede. My mother-in-law was right, once again.  And, I was wrong, once again, and with a wise-acre attitude to boot. Sorry mom.
Now I think I’ll take a swig of the 10-year dead package of Alka Seltzer in my medicine chest to ease the nausea I’m feeling from calculating how many billions of dollars the pharmaceutical industry bilks out of unknowing consumers every year who discard perfectly good drugs and buy new ones because they trust the industry’s “expiration date labeling.”

Drug Expiration Dates – Do They Mean Anything?

With a splitting headache you reach into your medicine cabinet for some aspirin only to find the stamped expiration date on the bottle has passed – two years ago. So, do you take it or don’t you? If you decide to take the aspirin will it be a fatal mistake or will you simply continue to suffer from the headache?

This is a dilemma many people face in some way or another. A column published in Pyschopharmacology Today offers some advice.

It turns out that the expiration date on a drug does stand for something, but probably not what you think it does. Since a law was passed in 1979, drug manufacturers are required to stamp an expiration date on their products. This is the date at which the manufacturer can still guarantee the full potency and safety of the drug.

Most of what is known about drug expiration dates comes from a study conducted by the Food and Drug Administration at the request of the military. With a large and expensive stockpile of drugs, the military faced tossing out and replacing its drugs every few years. What they found from the study is 90% of more than 100 drugs, both prescription and over-the-counter, were perfectly good to use even 15 years after the expiration date.

So the expiration date doesn’t really indicate a point at which the medication is no longer effective or has become unsafe to use. Medical authorities state expired drugs are safe to take, even those that expired years ago. A rare exception to this may be tetracycline, but the report on this is controversial among researchers. It’s true the effectiveness of a drug may decrease over time, but much of the original potency still remains even a decade after the expiration date. Excluding nitroglycerin, insulin, and liquid antibiotics, most medications are as long-lasting as the ones tested by the military. Placing a medication in a cool place, such as a refrigerator, will help a drug remain potent for many years.

Is the expiration date a marketing ploy by drug manufacturers, to keep you restocking your medicine cabinet and their pockets regularly? You can look at it that way. Or you can also look at it this way: The expiration dates are very conservative to ensure you get everything you paid for. And, really, if a drug manufacturer had to do expiration-date testing for longer periods it would slow their ability to bring you new and improved formulations.

The next time you face the drug expiration date dilemma, consider what you’ve learned here. If the expiration date passed a few years ago and it’s important that your drug is absolutely 100% effective, you might want to consider buying a new bottle. And if you have any questions about the safety or effectiveness of any drug, ask your pharmacist. He or she is a great resource when it comes to getting more information about your medications.

November 2003 Update


In the course of past several days I have heard the following: the first black Republican President, this is after the apparent disconnect of the Dupublican party with the majority of the country over the past 2 presidential elections. When will the political parties understand that dividing the populace into segments has no modern day value or relativity? The milestones in America have been accented by the first, Black man, the first Back woman, the first Woman, the first Jewish person, the first Catholic or the first person of any gender, Race  and  religious persuasion. The political process has accented these issues to point of exacerbating situations that are of no real importance to most Americans. What we all want, desire and so desperately need is an end to media exploitation of the differences among Americans as news or entertainment. Imagine if the elected officials we currently have really paid attention to ALL of their constituents as they purport to, we would (I venture to say) have a better economy is spite of the problems that exist. Under the guise of protecting us these elected tacit hate mongers have created rifts where there were none and those rifts are propagated by people who are too young and inexperienced to realize where this nation came from. One could read the Constitution from end to end and still not have a complete picture of what we are about but our Congress assumes that ability by the so called power of the Office and the Oath they took upon assuming the duties of that office. The power they have is from the people and not the mantle of office. We the  people give that power by virtue of our votes and donations so it is within our power to remove them for cause by the power of the same vote. If as voters we stop picketing start voting away from party lines , we will see the fruits of those labors quicker than a picket line. Remember many big spenders support groups that benefits them not necessarily All  Americans.

Help me continue to publish

Help me continue to publish


I recently sent this cartoon around to many of my friends and family, I received a reply from my Firend Martin along with a couple of his limericks.

Free Range

THis cartoon prompted a reply from my friend Martin, these are his m  limericks that have been published in his local paper.

Limerick Commentaries

By

Martin Egelston

Fiscally sound, or sleeping on the job?

Certain Congressmen are using tricks of the tongue to describe their office slumbering as fiscally responsible acts.   It is unhealthy physically and fiscally.

One fifth of Congressional males,

Do sleep where they work without fail.

It adds twenty grand

For their work in dreamland,

And exemption from this taxing detail.

Battle Creek Enquirer 1/30/2012

Vagabonds, Our reps on the Hill

 

Abel Oldsworth, my reticent friend, wonders if Congressional members could be more effective if they were present at the Capitol more days than they are absent.  Who supervises them?  His penned words indicate that he does not have and answer

 

Many members of Congress proclaim,

They are pure of the Beltway’s domain.

So they spend three days there

To get time for elsewhere;

Now who knows what they do in the main.

Battle Creek Enquirer 3/10/2013

 

Please Donate

Please Donate


 

Please Donate

Please Donate

 

A well known hair product was touting shampoo for “colored Hair”. This ignited a minor brain storm featuring: “what is colored hair”? Is the implication hair that is dyed, tinted or ethnic? Could colored hair be colored? What is “colored hair”?  All questions that are answerable in several ways and with several meanings. Examining “colored”, there are no colored people, there are people of assorted human color hues from pale to dark. The general  thought about color is anyone who is not “white” is colored yet the question is what is colored and what is white?  White as a human description isn’t the skin tone could be likened to the flesh tone found in a box of crayons. That is definitely not white but is a color!, considering the anthropological findings over the years we are all “colored”. These findings and possible revelations could serve as an indication that we have been doing it wrong all of these centuries and all over the known world. Modern man with all of their learning is no farther along than the first communal settlements where the differences were relegated to different villages with no color involved. War between villages existed and possibly slavery yet there appears to be no evidence of color bias just geographic, cultural and religious differences.


There is a law in the process of being passed that would maintain the sound level of commercials to the level of the program it is attached to. If that is accomplished then when will the commercials be limited? In the early days of television the announcers on some the shows would announce (imagine that) the upcoming commercials with a line like: we will be right back after a quick word from our sponsors or we will take a 60 second break. Todays advertising consists of groups of commercial breaks lasting about 3 to 4 minutes and averaging 8 to 10 sponsors per break. This indicates each as is 10 to 25 or 30 seconds each. Imagine having just that small amount of time to persuade you to buy something.To accomplish that and keep your attention the ad agencies are producing products that get your attention with color, music and voice overs. The two main attention getters are the sound and visual aspects. The actual productions are as big as  Hollywood and as elaborate as any 30′ and 40′ musicals. The 60 second break was never 60 seconds and now it is 3-4 minutes of entertainment which results in sales of products and services. The key to making a judgement on the product or service is in the fine print which we never read as they are really small and shown very quick.  Look at what I have inserted below.

Help me continue to publish

Help me continue to publish