Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: June 2020


ABC NEWS

3 hrs ago

As the district attorney of Fulton County, Georgia, Paul L. Howard Jr. says he attends a lot of funerals.© Erik S Lesser/EPA via Shutterstock Fulton County District Attorney Paul L. Howard Jr. speaks during a press conference announcing charges against Atlanta Police Department officer Garrett Rolfe in the fatal police shooting of Rayshard Brooks in Atlanta, Georgia, June 17, 2020.

Tuesday, at the invitation of the Brooks family, Howard attended Rayshard Brooks’ funeral, which was held to honor the late father of four, just one day after Father’s Day.

In an interview with ABC News, Howard said seeing the family of Brooks at the service “magnified the hurt” he felt when he watched the video of Brooks’ death.

Brooks was fatally gunned down by police in a Wendy’s parking lot in Atlanta, Georgia on June 12.

“Because of our investigation, I had a chance to watch an extraordinary kind of interchange between him and two police officers, and it’s almost like you got a chance to know something about him and his life just by watching [those] 41 minutes or so. And so I wanted to honor his death,” Howard said.

Howard continues to face criticism from lawmakers and the police union representing Atlanta police officers for his decision last week to charge former officer Garrett Rolfe and officer Devin Brosnan in the shooting death of Brooks. But Howard said he was “just doing his job.”

“What we do is to look at the evidence. And in this case, we had the evidence that was before us. And my philosophy is we should move,” Howard told ABC News. “If we had been talking about a civilian who shot someone, I’ve never heard anybody say that we indicted or charged the civilian quickly. It’s strange that people only talk about quickly when you’re talking about a policeman. I think that’s one of the things that we’ve got to change in this country.”

The fatal shooting of Rayshard Brooks, an African-American man, by a white police officer in Atlanta has poured more fuel on the raging US debate over racism, prompting another round of street protests and the resignation of the southern city’s police chief. The death of 27-year-old Brooks was ruled a homicide by the county medical examiner’s office on June 14, 2020, a day after Wendy’s restaurant where he died was set on fire and hundreds of people marched to denounce the killing.

Howard said that there was nothing political about his decision to charge the officers, referring to the first police case his office prosecuted in 2002. That case, he said, involved a 19-year-old Black man who was killed by police while sitting in a car that belonged to his mother, but which an officer believed was stolen. “Every case that we’ve handled, that’s what they’ve said, it’s political, every case,” he said.

Howard also defended himself against criticism that he charged the officers before the Georgia Bureau of Investigations finished its investigation. He said his office had “enough evidence to move” and that they are not required by law “to wait for anyone.”

He questioned the criticism further, noting that the GBI is a state police office. “I guess people are suggesting that we should wait for the police to tell us how they’ve investigated themselves. I don’t think that’s the way that the law works. We are independent. We made an independent decision and we will appreciate the report when they get it to us,” Howard said.

Howard’s office continues to add to its own investigation and is preparing for a bond hearing for Rolfe scheduled for next Tuesday. He told ABC News that he does not expect the grand jury to convene in this case until October 1.

His office is not planning on seeking the death penalty, the harshest possible punishment, for Rolfe’s felony murder charge. “We have not even gotten to the point that we’re thinking about what kind of sentence we’re asking,” Howard said.

Meanwhile, both Rolfe, through his legal team, and Brosnan, have denied the allegations against them, which include that they were late in administering aid to Brooks after he was shot. Howard said he charged the officers based on videotape evidence. “It’s really critical in a case when somebody has been shot twice in the back that there ought to be some immediate medical attention, and I know people will say that you shot in the heart and that means you can’t survive; that doesn’t mean that you should not try,” he said.

Howard believes that the officers broke the rules when they did not immediately attempt to keep Brooks alive.

Howard has also been critiqued for backtracking on whether a Taser is a deadly weapon, deciding so in the recent tasing incident of college students Taniyah Pilgrim and Messiah Young, but seeming not to decide the same in this case. “You know what they seem to be saying, ‘Mr. Howard, if you’re not perfect, if you made a mistake in the other case then now you have to bear with it,” Howard said. He called the criticism “hogwash” and disgraceful to Mr. Brooks. “First of all, Mr. Brooks, at the time he was shot, he was running away, his back was turned. He was not firing a Taser. So why people are engaged in this imaginary argument about a Taser, I’m not real sure,” he said.

Howard contended the Taser had nothing to do with Brooks’ death. “He was some 18 feet, 3 inches from the officer when he shot him. And I would just ask people to use their common sense. And if you did that, I don’t think you’d be talking about a Taser,” he added.

Howard took particular issue with the officers’ actions after Brooks was gunned down. For one, he said that Rolfe kicked Brooks. Brosnan, meanwhile, admitted that he stood on Brooks’ shoulder, because he thought he was still a threat.

“Number one, you don’t shoot a man in the back. You know, it’s the immediate sign of a coward when you shoot a man in the back. But once you do that, when a man is already down, you know, even if you were hunting an animal, if you were hunting a deer, when the deer is down, you don’t walk over and then kick him and stand on him,” Howard said.

“So when people are talking to me about Tasers, and how quickly you finished, I’m saying to them, ‘Did you see the insult to humanity?'” Howard said. “‘What are we going to do about that?’ And I think what those young kids on the streets are trying to say to people is, ‘When are you going to pay attention to what’s really happening?'”

Howard has a lengthy list of policy suggestions to answer protesters’ outcry for change in policing. He believes the nation should require all police misconduct criminal incidents to be independently investigated by a police agency separate from the department involved in the act of misconduct. Additionally, Howard would like to see district attorneys as the “gatekeepers” to the criminal justice system, granted the authority to charge police officers in the death of a civilian without the involvement of a grand jury.

He believes there should be a national law that every police officer, federal or state, involved in the arrest of an individual, or in contact with civilians, be required to wear and operate a body camera and utilize dash cameras. He also believes an independent federal agency should be created devoted to police shootings and collecting data. That agency would keep a nationwide database of officers involved in police misconduct and use of force incidents, develop and provide training standards and programs, reward police departments and communities that practice and excel in de-escalation with pay increases and pay incentives and provide an avenue for citizens to appeal local prosecutors’ decisions not to charge or prosecute cases. This agency would be authorized to prosecute state cases in federal court.

In addition to policy reform, Howard argued there needs to also be a culture change. It begins with what he called the “thin blue line” — the lack of officers willing to speak out against their fellow officers.

“What I hear people say often is, ‘Well, you know, there’s some good police officers, some bad ones, few bad ones, but everybody else is good.’ And this is where I ask people all the time, ‘Well, guys, when is the last time that you heard of those good officers testifying or complaining about the bad officers?'” he said.

Howard believes the conduct of police unions and what they mean to police departments and the average citizen also needs to be examined.

“There’s a culture that has developed. If we don’t change that culture, then the result that we’re going to get is going to continue to be the same,” he added. But until that change comes, he said he hopes the young people in Atlanta keep putting pressure on the system.

“I’m hopeful that we can change. I’m hopeful that people will say this is too much,” Howard said. “As an African American, my feeling is the reason we haven’t stopped is because the deaths are mainly deaths of African Americans — and until we accept the fact that we are not treated equally as citizens of this country, we will continue to make these mistakes.”

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate


The removal of Confederate remembrances and  statues has been a source of national uproar both pro and con. The facts are: The civil war was a rebellion and as such a armed action against the United States. An Armed insurrection against the country is the act of Traitors and therefore treason according to the law. The celebration of traitors is not and never has been a good look for a country that touts it’s freedoms for all. This country was born out of insurrection but we failed as a country to treat the native Americans and the enslaved (stolen) Americans as people. The biases implicit and specific against all non whites in America has brought us no peace and has been exacerbated by the election of TOTUS. Our neer do well Congress has abetted this incompetent administration while lining their own pockets in the name of their constituents. It is incumbent on all of us to educate our selves on what this Administration is and has done (in our names) while feeding us the deadly Kool aid of racism and division. It is the right of everyone to have an opinion on whatever they want but the lack of facts in that opinion is pure ignorance and small minded. We as voters  should be required to learn our REAL history  as early as kindergarten. Once all citizens of this country understand our real collective history we should be able to make realistic choices on who represents all of us.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate


A counter to Black Lives Matter has been  All Lives Matter. If indeed all lives matter or mattered, then there would be no need for  Black Lives matter. This is point not made by anyone that I am aware of. It is heartening to see the diverse population  at the various rallies yet our Neer do well Congress cannot or will not pay heed to the streets that are crowded with voters of all colors and hues (I omitted Race as we are all human). I submit that since our “representatives” are not listening to us then we need to either supply them with “hearing aids” like marches, rallies and votes. It long overdue for All lives to matter and elect people who follow the mandates of the people and not their own interests and large donors. In The upcoming election there needs to be a referendum on the majority party since they seemingly blindly follow the party line (and TOTUS) against the interest of the people who voted them in. Their participation in the actions of this sham Administration while continuing their  own actions against the public interest is reason enough to put new people in place and work towards limiting their time in office. If all lives matter then voting against long time servers who have not served with honor should be a no brainer.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate


June 18, 2020 at 10:52 a.m. CDT

It’s the term of the moment: “Defund the police.” But is there a better way than simply abolishing the police? Criminologists Justin Nix of the University of Nebraska at Omaha and Scott Wolfe of Michigan State University say there are effective ways to conduct policing that both reduce crime and build community trust.

By Justin Nix and Scott Wolfe

U.S. policing is once again at a crossroad. Widespread protests have swept the globe in response to George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis police custody. There is now significant public pressure to “defund” or “disband” the police as a means of reducing racial disparities, especially concerning the use of excessive force by officers. The problem is that it is unclear what this will actually involve.

Justin Nix, assistant professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha.
Justin Nix, assistant professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. (Rebecca S. Gratz/UNO)

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti (D), for example, has proposed cutting nearly $150 million from the LAPD’s budget. It is unclear where the money saved will be allocated. The Minneapolis City Council is going more extreme by disbanding the entire Minneapolis Police Department. It is unclear what their exact plan is for a replacement. Moving forward, we really need to (1) hold police departments accountable for their spending and (2) reconsider forcing the police to respond to so many of society’s ills.

Our concern is that politicians and legislators feel pressured to do something — anything — about complex problems in policing, which could lead to hasty, ill-conceived and poorly planned decisions. We have enough research evidence to be concerned about the immediate impact of drastic budget cuts or wholesale disbanding of police agencies: Crime and victimization will increase. More people will be robbed, more people will be shot, and more people will die. More homes will be broken into and more cars will be stolen. People who have the means will pack up and move. Businesses will suffer. These collateral consequences will disproportionately harm minority communities that need help, not further marginalization.

Scott Wolfe is an associate professor in the School of Criminal Justice at Michigan State University.
Scott Wolfe is an associate professor in the School of Criminal Justice at Michigan State University. (Derrick L. Turner/MSU)

Cities that have more police officers per capita tend to have lower crime rates. This does not necessarily mean we need to hire more police. Rather, having more officers per capita provides greater ability to dedicate resources to community- and problem-oriented policing approaches that have been shown to reduce crime and improve community satisfaction. Sufficient staffing allows departments to respond to 911 calls while simultaneously taking part in such proactive policing.

Many, such as Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), are pointing to the 2012 reform of the Camden (N.J.) Police Department as evidence that “disbanding” an agency works. What really happened in Camden was that the city’s police services expanded to the county and the agency adopted a new name. Most Camden officers who were laid off were immediately rehired by the newly formed Camden County Police Department. This resulted in more police officers on Camden’s streets. This would appear to be in conflict with what some advocates of defunding and disbanding police departments are pushing for.

The expansion also coincided with significant violent-crime reductions. More officers on the street allowed the Camden County Police Department to engage in more community- and problem-oriented policing. Therefore, the Camden experience illustrates that proactive policing strategies work, not necessarily that disbanding is an effective reform strategy. It also shows us that the agency’s other efforts, such as use of force-policy revision and improved officer training, are key to reform. Slashing police department budgets without a definitive plan for reform will leave much less time for officers to engage in strategies shown to reduce crime and victimization.

Defunding or disbanding the police will probably lead to more citizens arming themselves out of fear that police will not be around to offer help. This will put more guns on the street and increase the chances that another Ahmaud Arbery tragedy occurs. More guns in circulation could mean more suicides, more accidental shootings and more guns that can be stolen and used to commit acts of violence.

Make no mistake, police reform is needed. We could be witnessing a watershed moment — an opportunity to reimagine the function of police in our society. But this opportunity will be wasted if our local governments make hasty decisions in the face of public pressure. Rather than defunding or disbanding, a more promising approach to police reform will involve two things.

First, before taking money away from the police, local governments need to hold agencies more accountable for their spending. We need to determine whether resources are being used to fund evidence-based policing practicestraining programs and proper use of technology. Only then could we have an informed discussion about budget-cutting or reallocation. In some jurisdictions, this process will result in trimming agency budgets and reducing the number of officers. In other areas, however, this could shed light on a need to increase police budgets.

Second, we need to reconsider making the police responsible for so many societal ills. The police response to drug epidemics and the mental health crisis has failed. We need better state and local infrastructures to handle those problems. And, such plans need to be in place before reallocating money that once went to the police.

With such plans in place, many police officers would welcome relinquishing such responsibilities. This would put us in a better position to reduce racial disparities and the use of excessive force. And it would give officers more time to focus on problem-solving with their community members and attending more training programs — both of which would improve community outcomes. We hope reason and care prevail in our search for effective police reform.

Headshot of Tom Jackman

Tom Jackman has been covering criminal justice for The Washington Post since 1998 and anchors the True Crime blog. He previously covered crime and courts for the Kansas City Star.Follow

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate


Apparently TOTUS is not warning of the possibility of contracting COVID19 other than asking for a signed declaration of no fault if you contract COVID 19 while packed in a closed space to listen to more lies. So much for empathy for his supporters. MA

Trump Warns protestors ahead of Tulsa Rally
President Trump on Friday warned individuals against protesting in Tulsa, Okla., ahead of his Saturday campaign rally there, suggesting any demonstrators would be treated harshly.

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie: Trump warns protesters ahead of Tulsa rally© Pool/UPI Photo Trump warns protesters ahead of Tulsa rally“Any protesters, anarchists, agitators, looters or lowlifes who are going to Oklahoma please understand, you will not be treated like you have been in New York, Seattle, or Minneapolis,” Trump tweeted Friday. “It will be a much different scene!”

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Any protesters, anarchists, agitators, looters or lowlifes who are going to Oklahoma please understand, you will not be treated like you have been in New York, Seattle, or Minneapolis. It will be a much different scene!

84.5K people are talking about this

Trump has heavily criticized Democratic leaders in New York, Seattle and Minneapolis for not sufficiently cracking down on demonstrations that have erupted across the country to protest racism and police brutality in the wake of the death of George Floyd.

The city of Tulsa has announced a curfew for Friday and Saturday in order to prevent violent protesting around Trump’s rally, which has been shrouded in controversy since the president initially announced plans last week to hold it in Tulsa on June 19.

Trump was forced to move the date to June 20 after widespread outcry over the campaign’s decision to not just stage the event on Juneteenth, an annual holiday that marks the end of slavery in the United States, but to stage it in Tulsa, the site of one of the deadliest incidents of anti-black racial violence in the country in 1921.

The Trump campaign has also faced criticism for holding the large-scale event during the coronavirus pandemic, prompting concerns from the city’s health department.

The campaign plans to distribute masks and hand sanitizer to attendees as well as perform temperature checks before the rallygoers enter Tulsa’s BOK Center. The venue holds 19,000 people, and the campaign said it has received more than 1 million requests for tickets.

Attendees have also been asked to sign a coronavirus waiver.

Trump has been repeatedly criticized for his handling of the protests in the wake of Floyd’s killing at the hands of police in Minneapolis.

While Trump has expressed outrage at Floyd’s death, he has also sharply criticized protests that have at times turned violent and has demanded that states more forcefully crack down on the demonstrations.

Trump earlier this month threatened to dispatch active-duty troops to areas that do not sufficiently suppress the demonstrations. The president has more recently excoriated Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) and Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan (D) for failing to dispel a group of protesters that have occupied part of the city.

“You have a governor who doesn’t do a damn thing about it, and you have a mayor that doesn’t know she’s alive,” Trump told reporters on Monday.

“If they don’t do the job, I’ll do the job,” Trump continued, without offering specifics.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate



“In the United States of America, all of us are equal under the law. Period. Say that as loud as you can”-Tucker Carlson.

This quote from a monologue by Mr. Carlson taken alone would indicate that he is a centrist or a liberal mined person. If you read the entire statement you will find that Mr. Carlson has not changed but issued a convoluted statement that says nothing of import or different that what he says daily. There are several on air personalities who side and perhaps adore the current administration and the leaders(?) thereof. The only thing as citizens we can and should do is to get to the polls to elect representatives who will do the job of representing us all “EQUALLY!”. We have had many years of  mealy mouthed office seekers who in the end have their own interests in mind along with what ever their party’s goal’s are no matter the detriment to the voters whom they “swore” on a bible to serve honestly. It should be clear to all that as voters and citizens that we are under attack from inside our own government by the  very people we elected. TOTUS and Bitch McConnell separately have “greased the already slippery slope of anarchy which will (if we let it) cause more division. The action or inaction in the current pandemic is the best indicator of how poor this administration and his abettors have served us.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate

 


The recent  demonstrations across the country and the world in solidarity with Black Lives Matter has shown that “All Lives” matter no matter who or where they are. Once (as it appears now) all people of all colors,  orientations and economic status understand that this divide among people is a device made up by and perpetuated by higher income individuals and politicians for their own advantage there will be a reckoning beginning at the ballot box. It was and is the political establishment who allowed and fostered segregation and division among people. There are equivalencies in social economic and issues at all levels but the dividers want to make this about race to keep the divide going. Using  race gets “more bang for the buck” as kindling for the fire storm to come in the coming election season. If as voters  we do not step up, the baser elements of the political establishment will prevail.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate


As usual TOTUS is wrong, the lack of leadership and understanding what his job is glows like neon lights. Unfortunately he is incapable of telling the truth and it hurts all of us, especially his base. We must remember and be aware that the upcoming rally in Oklahoma will produce another round of Covid-19 infections which will go undetected due to lack of national testing and contact tracing. The  lack of Federal assistance in this emergency is a large part of why the pandemic not being slowed. MA

Andrew Romano

West Coast Correspondent,

Yahoo News•June 16, 2020

As coronavirus cases continue to climb in more than 20 states, raising fears of a second wave of hospitalizations and deaths, some politicians have taken to waving away the worrisome news with a rudimentary, reassuring explanation.

Of course the number of COVID-19 cases is going up, they say. That’s what happens when you test more people: You find more infections. 

On Monday, President Trump added his voice to this soothing chorus. “Our testing is so much bigger and more advanced than any other country (we have done a great job on this!) that it shows more cases,” Trump tweeted in the morning. “Without testing, or weak testing, we would be showing almost no cases. Testing is a double edged sword – Makes us look bad, but good to have!!!”

“If we stop testing right now,” the president added during an event for seniors at the White House, “we’d have very few cases, if any.”

And according to a report in the New York Times, Vice President Mike Pence echoed Trump’s argument during a call Monday with governors, urging them “to continue to explain to your citizens the magnitude of the increase in testing” in order to “encourage people with the news that we’re safely reopening the country.”

 

Trump is right about one thing: The U.S. is now conducting more  COVID-19 tests than any other country, in total (about 465,000 a day) and per capita (about 1.25 per 1,000 residents). But his nonsensical, if-a-tree-falls-in-the-forest suggestion that somehow coronavirus infections would cease to exist if we stopped trying to detect them is dangerously deluded, and saying so only contributes to a sense of complacency that threatens to further accelerate the spread of the virus.

It doesn’t take advanced math to debunk Trump’s claim. Just look at Florida, where Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, one of the president’s staunchest allies, has recently been brushing off questions from reporters with a similar line.

“As you’re testing more, you’re going to find more cases,” DeSantis said Thursday.

Florida has certainly been finding more cases. On Monday, the Sunshine State reported a daily increase of 1,758 COVID-19 infections. That number follows two days with more than 2,000 new coronavirus cases, including the state’s highest-ever daily total on Saturday (2,581). It also represents the 12th day out of the last 13 that the state has announced more than 1,000 new cases.

This means Florida’s seven-day rolling average of COVID-19 infections — an important metric that helps to balance out daily fluctuations in reporting — has gone up every day since the beginning of the month. On June 1, Florida’s seven-day average stood at 726 cases per day. As of June 15, it had more than doubled to 1,775.

 

If Trump and DeSantis were right that testing accounts for this increase, it should also show up as a proportional increase in the number of new tests conducted each day over the same period.

But that’s not what the data shows. In reality, Florida has been conducting roughly the same average number of COVID-19 tests every day for the last month. During the last two weeks of May, the state conducted 369,557 tests in total, or 26,396 per day on average. During the first two weeks of June, the state conducted 387,666 tests in total, or 27,690 per day on average.

In other words, the number of tests conducted per day in Florida was unchanged, while average cases more than doubled. And so Trump and DeSantis are incorrect: Testing doesn’t explain Florida’s recent increase in infections.

The truth about testing is that it delivers diminishing returns. Sure, there’s an initial relationship between increased testing and increased case counts; the people who seek out tests first are the most likely to be sick. But scale up capacity and you start to test more and more people with less and less chance of infection. Eventually, there’s not much correlation between the amount of testing and the scale of an epidemic.

Other data from Florida reflects this dynamic as well. For instance: If the size of the state’s outbreak were stable — and if the growing case count were simply the inevitable, even desirable byproduct of increased testing — then the percentage of positive tests per day would be going down (or, at worst, staying the same).

Instead, Florida’s seven-day rolling average of positive tests rose from 3.85 percent on June 1 to 6.35 percent on June 15.

 

Likewise, if Florida were merely detecting more cases through increased testing — without more people there actually getting sick — then the number of residents showing up at hospitals with COVID-19 would be holding steady.

It’s not, though. Over the last week, the state’s seven-day average of new hospitalizations has climbed from a little more than 100 per day to nearly 150 per day.

Florida is hardly alone in this. Between June 7 and June 14, the seven-day rolling average of positive tests rose from 6.2 percent to 13.5 percent in Alabama, from 12.3 percent to 15.6 percent in Arizona, from 5.6 percent to 19.7 percent in Mississippi and from 6.4 percent to 13.7 percent in South Carolina — a sign that their outbreaks are growing, regardless of testing capacity. Many other states, including Alaska, Nevada, Idaho, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming, have also registered rising positive-testing rates in recent days.

There are some places where increased testing is, in fact, detecting more asymptomatic infections, such as California. There, the seven-day average of total daily tests has risen from about 53,000 to 63,000 so far this month — even as hospitalizations have leveled off and the positive-test rate has fallen from about 5 percent to about 4.5 percent.

But that is not the story in Florida, or in many of the other states where case counts are soaring. Rt is an epidemiological statistic that represents transmissibility, or the number of people a sick person infects at a particular point in an epidemic. An Rt below 1.0 indicates that each person infects, on average, less than one other person; an Rt above 1.0 indicates that an outbreak is growing. Six weeks ago, only 10 states had an Rt of 1.0 or higher. Today, 18 states are hovering above that troubling threshold.

 

For now, none of these states looks like the next New York City. The percentage of residents infected with COVID-19 remains relatively low. Testing capacity is much higher than before. Hospitals aren’t stretched thin yet. People understand how to wear masks and keep their distance, even if they’re tired of it. New outbreaks shouldn’t catch Americans by surprise.

The operative word, however, is shouldn’t. If we refuse to accept why those outbreaks are happening, we may also refuse to do what it takes to stop them from spiraling out of control. Telling ourselves that it’s all just a result of more testing absolves us of responsibility. Things only look bad because we’re doing something good, Trump says. Our behavior isn’t to blame.

But our behavior is to blame. The coronavirus doesn’t magically retreat when a governor decides it’s time to relax lockdown measures. The pathogen will continue to spread wherever and whenever people interact at a distance of less than 6 feet, without a mask and especially indoors.

As states reopen — and many of the states with rising case counts were among the earliest and most eager to resume business as usual — the more their residents start to ease up on social distancing. The more people ease up, the more they risk contracting the coronavirus.

Some of this risk is tolerable — the unavoidable cost of coexisting with a virus to which we have not yet developed any immunity. But if we insist, like Trump, that there is no cost to letting down our guard — that the virus isn’t spreading; that rising case counts are a statistical illusion; that there is no reason for caution — then we may not recognize and respond to what’s really happening until it’s too late.

America tried that once before. It didn’t go well.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate


Dan Frosch, Ben Chapman  
Detective Luther Hall was working undercover during protests that gripped St. Louis in 2017 following the police shooting of a black man, when several officers in riot gear rushed up to him.

Before Mr. Hall, who is black, could comply with their demands to get on the ground, he was body slammed by an officer, according to court filings. The 22-year veteran said the white officers punched, kicked and struck him with batons before a SWAT team member recognized him and hustled him away. Mr. Hall later told investigators that his fellow officers “beat the [expletive] out of him like Rodney King,” according to a Federal Bureau of Investigation affidavit.

Though Detective Hall’s case, which has led to federal criminal charges against the officers involved, is extreme, black officers across the country say they commonly face harassment, discrimination and even abuse from their own departments, according to interviews and court filings.

Many black officers said they understood the anger behind nationwide protests initially sparked by the killing of George Floyd. Not only does law enforcement need to change how they police minority communities, these officers said, but departments also need to change how they treat their own minority officers.

“The same hell that black people were experiencing on the streets, we were experiencing inside the department,” said Eric Adams, who retired from the New York Police Department as a captain in 2006. Mr. Adams, who is now Brooklyn borough president, said the dynamic hasn’t changed.

NYPD First Deputy Commissioner Benjamin Tucker, also black, said that the department had transformed its approach to race since he began his career there in 1968, when most officers were white. About 53% of the NYPD’s uniformed force is now nonwhite, according to department statistics. Census data shows that about 68% of New York City residents are nonwhite.

But Mr. Tucker said more attention to racial issues within the department was needed, especially after the uproar over Mr. Floyd’s death.

a man standing in front of a crowd: Following the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police on May 25, protests emerged in more than 40 cities across the U.S and several countries around the globe. As protesters flooded the streets seeking justice for Floyd, police officers and protestors have often clashed. As ELLE.com noted earlier this week, Minneapolis protesters were met with tear gas and rubber bullets from officers while marching. President Trump received a public notice from Twitter when he tweeted, in part, "when the looting starts, the shooting starts." Two protestors in Davenport, Iowa and one in Louisville, Kentucky (the hometown of Breonna Taylor, a fellow victim of police brutality) have been killed.But amid the vandalism, violence, and bloodshed there were also people peacefully protesting against racism and police brutality. As thousands across the country chanted, "I can't breathe," and "Black lives matter," some police officers in Flint, Michigan, New York and Ferguson, Missouri  showed signs of solidarity with those protesting against Floyd's murder. Ahead, powerful images of peaceful protesting from the past week.

Gallery by photo servicesAfrican-Americans have taken leadership positions in numerous large police departments across the country over the past 20 years. Still, nationwide, the number of black officers has stayed steady at about 11%, according to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

The Wall Street Journal has identified nearly two dozen lawsuits or settlements involving black officers who alleged discrimination against departments across the country over the past three years.

In one 2018 federal discrimination lawsuit, several black officers in Arkansas with the Little Rock Police Department alleged white colleagues openly used racial slurs, harassed black citizens and unfairly disciplined black officers. The city, whose current and prior police chiefs are both black, settled the lawsuit in February for $200,000 without admitting wrongdoing.

Sgt. Willie Davis, a plaintiff in the suit, said black officers didn’t always trust white commanders to take action if they reported misconduct.

“Officers who look like me learn early that if you keep your mouth shut, you’ll be fine. So you develop this attitude of ‘going along, to get along,’” he said.

Sgt. Davis said he was now uncomfortable encouraging the black youth he mentors to go into law enforcement.

“I wouldn’t want them to endure what I see,” he said.

Little Rock Police Chief Keith Humphrey said that the majority of his officers—white and black—were “amazing.” But he said a small group of white officers had stoked racial tensions within the department and caused problems for black colleagues.

San Francisco Police Department Captain Yulanda Williams joined the force in 1990, hoping to improve relations between police and minorities. Last May, she sued the city and the Police Department, alleging she’d been targeted by white co-workers and supervisors for speaking out against racism and sexism.

Co-workers harassed Ms. Williams for her Afrocentric hairstyle, according to the complaint, and a supervisor told her she needed to choose the police over her identity as a black person. “Pick a side. You seem confused about this,” the supervisor said, according to the complaint.

Ms. Williams said trying to change the culture in the department was “like trying to turn the Titanic.” SFPD officials declined to comment.

Heather Taylor, a supervisor with the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department’s homicide division, is president of the Ethical Society of Police, a black officers’ group. Ms. Taylor said racism continued to afflict the department, where about 30% of the roughly 1,200 member force is black. About 47% of St. Louis residents are black.

In one recent incident, Ms. Taylor said a white police dispatcher referred in a social-media post to people protesting Mr. Floyd’s death as “animals.” In a second recent incident, a black officer found a note in a precinct cabinet that read “Hitler rules,” she said.

“Undeniably, there is racial tension among our ranks,” said St. Louis police Chief John Hayden, who is black, adding that new antibias training will examine officers’ interactions and decisions.

Ms. Taylor said Detective Hall’s case showed the difference in how police often treated African-Americans in St. Louis. Mr. Hall had a white undercover partner who was unharmed despite also being arrested during the protests, according to court filings.

“The Police Department makes it clear: When it comes down to it, you will be shown that you’re black first,” Ms. Taylor said.

A federal grand jury indicted five St. Louis police officers on charges related to Mr. Hall’s beating and for trying to cover up what happened. Two pleaded guilty and are awaiting sentencing. The other three have pleaded not guilty. A lawyer for one of the officers said his client was innocent.

Mr. Hall declined to comment through his lawyers.

Some senior black law-enforcement officials said prejudice was ingrained in white colleagues who had little experience with black people outside of law enforcement.

Charlie Smith, an African-American former Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives top official who retired in 2017, said he’d grown inured to racism during his career. On his first day as an ATF agent in 1987, Mr. Smith said a fellow agent asked him “How does it feel to get this job only because you’re a [racial slur]?” Twenty years later, now a SWAT commander, he recalled being pulled over while off-duty by white officers and handcuffed because they thought he matched a suspect’s description

Mr. Smith said that too often, white police officers viewed black neighborhoods as dangerous places filled with bad people, a sentiment echoed by other black officers.

In a 2015 study of smaller Northeastern police departments by the National Association of Black Law Enforcement Officers, 91% of 102 officers surveyed said that racial profiling existed within their agencies. Seventy percent said that police supervisors and administrators condoned the practice, the survey found.

Last week in Little Rock, a young, black detective invited fellow police officers to join a peaceful protest to show solidarity with minority communities. When Chief Humphrey arrived, he was dismayed to find only four white officers showed up compared with 21 black officers, he said.

“Those white officers who showed up…they did some reflecting and said ‘You know we need to do a better job, and we get it,’” Chief Humphrey said.

Asked why he thought more white officers didn’t join, he said, “Some of it is fear. Some of it is ‘I don’t give a damn.’ Some of it is ‘Well, I don’t live in this city so it’s not my problem.’ Some just don’t know what to do.’”

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate