Skip navigation

Daily Archives: September 5th, 2018


SEPTEMBER 4, 2018
Meyerson on TAP
The “Labor Question” Is Back, Big Time. That term came into use around the turn of the 20th century; it was a shorthand way of asking: What should be done about the abysmal conditions in which American workers were compelled to labor, and about the smoldering discontent those conditions engendered? The anger was palpable, made manifest in waves of worker revolts that stretched from the nationwide rail strike of 1877 through the general strikes of 1919.
Not all the battles were fought in the plants and in the streets. Progressive state legislatures in the early 20th century enacted laws setting minimum wages and limiting the hours women and children could be compelled to work; the courts routinely struck them down, and just as routinely short-circuited strikes by imposing jail sentences on strikers.
It was the New Deal, and the rise of unions that the New Deal facilitated, that rendered the Labor Question seemingly moot. In the three decades following World War II, when unions were strong and prosperity broadly shared, the term receded into the history books alongside other phrases—like, say, “slaveholder”—that evoked a dark and presumably buried side of America’s past.
For the last several decades, however, it’s the largely (if imperfectly) egalitarian spirit of the New Deal that has receded into the shadows. The economic inequality that preceded the New Deal is back with us; the Labor Question has returned.
At the core of the problem is the imbalance of economic power, which takes the form of booming profits and stagnating wages. The Financial Times recently reported that the share of company revenues going to profits is the highest in many years, which necessarily means that the share going to the main alternative destination for company revenues—employees’ pockets—has shrunk.
Nor is this a short-lived phenomenon brought about by the Republican tax cut. In 2011, the chief investment officer of JP Morgan Chase calculated that three-quarters of the long-term increase in U.S. companies’ profit margins was due to the declining share going to wages and benefits. A study last year by Simcha Barkai, then an economist at the University of Chicago’s Stigler Center, found that labor’s share of the national income has dropped by 6.7 percent since the mid-1980s, while the share of the nation’s income going to business investment in equipment, research, new hires and the like has also dropped by 7.2 percent. Correspondingly, the share of the nation’s income going to shareholders (the lion’s share to the very wealthy, among them the CEOs who are compensated with shares) rose by 13.5 percent. That shift has put American workers at a double disadvantage, as their wages and the private-sector investment that creates jobs and boosts productivity have both hit the skids.
Like slowly simmering frogs, Americans have required some time to grasp just how dire their situation has become. On Labor Day 2018, however, it’s clear that most of them now realize the need to reshuffle the power structure. A Gallup poll released on Friday showed support for unions at 62 percent, the highest level in 15 years, with majority backing from every demographic group except Republicans, and even they are evenly split, 45 percent to 47 percent.
The overwhelming public support for striking teachers this spring in such red states as West Virginia, Oklahoma, and Arizona was no fluke; another recent poll, this one from the venerable education pollster PDK, found 73 percent support for teachers’ strikes, and a remarkable 78 percent support from parents of school-age children. The 2-to-1 rejection of a right-to-work law this summer by Missouri voters is further evidence of a pro-labor shift in public opinion, as are the successful unionization campaigns over the past year of such not easily fired workers as university teaching assistants and journalists (including those at such venerable anti-union bastions as the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times).
As was the case during the years when the Labor Question was first before the nation, the chief instrument the right relies on to diminish worker power is the courts. The Supreme Court’s decision this June in the Janus case, which was meant to reduce the membership and resources of public-sector unions, was just the latest in a string of rulings to advantage corporate and Republican interests. During the past year, however, progressives have put forth some of the most far-reaching proposals in many decades to rebalance economic clout, including bills from two Democratic senators—Massachusetts’s Elizabeth Warren and Wisconsin’s Tammy Baldwin—that would require corporations to divide their boards between representatives of workers and representatives of shareholders.
Since conservatives and business interests began pecking away at the New Deal’s handiwork in the 1970s, class conflict in America has been largely one-sided. On this Labor Day, however, it’s clear that the battle has finally been joined. The Labor Question is before us and remains to be resolved. ~ HAROLD MEYERSON

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate

Advertisements

Creating a blog is relatively simple but often reading it is not however I will explain mine.

1.On the left top side is the Title, date and time blog is posted, categories (subject and sources).

2. Across the center  likes (stars)

3. Writer and source if information is taken from another source

4.Some time in a different font color is a short sentence or statement from me (my Opinion) will precede the actual blog and will have my initials at the end of the statement (MA)

5. Blog

6.Donation box at the end of the blog.

I make every effort to be correct in what I present but am not above making mistakes, comment good or bad are welcome but trolling is not as I feel that they are usually irrelevant and unsubstantiated.

Thank you for reading  my blog.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate

 


We have expected our politicians to be true to their party’s basic line however not to the extent of fanaticism. Every voter has their own take on what is proper and correct however many times these opinions do not reflect the real effect of enacting or acting on these opinions for the country as a whole. In any give and take there no winners or losers  if done properly with that said why are we still electing and re electing the same people to misrepresent us in Congress? Our Congress to quote a statement From Wikipedia:
The phrase “speaks with a forked tongue” means to say one thing and mean another or, to be hypocritical, or act in a duplicitous manner. In the longstanding tradition of many Native American tribes, “speaking with a forked tongue” has meant lying, and a person was no longer considered worthy of trust, once he had been shown to “speak with a forked tongue”. This phrase was also adopted by Americans around the time of the Revolution, and may be found in abundant references from the early 19th century — often reporting on American officers who sought to convince the tribal leaders with whom they negotiated that they “spoke with a straight and not with a forked tongue” (as for example, President Andrew Jackson told the Creek Nation in 1829[16]) According to one 1859 account, the native proverb that the “white man spoke with a forked tongue” originated as a result of the French tactic of the 1690s, in their war with the Iroquois, of inviting their enemies to attend a Peace Conference, only to be slaughtered or captured.”

It should be clear that our Congress (save a few )do not have the interest of their constituents in mind unless it serves them personally (or make big donations to their campaigns). This current political era (1945-2016) has brought us “McCarthyism” where there was a Red or communist behind every door and ruining may live in the process, the Watergate scandal where a sitting President had to resign and the attempted impeachment of a sitting President for lying to Congress. Now we have a political a party that helped elect a person unfit to be President just to get their personal agendas passed while allowing their constituencies to go with little or no quality health care, air quality regulations to be rolled back and abetted in the passing of a predatory tax “reform” which gives nothing to the least of us. In the wings is a movement to tinker with your Social Security earnings to offset the  deficit created by the “tax Reform”. These are the issues that too many of us either do not know about or possibly care about but readily accept the blatant falsehoods emanating from the White House and Congress with impunity. We are currently in the middle of a struggle between correct governance and malfeasance in governance and we (voters) are the agents of change.

btn_donateCC_LG

Please Donate

%d bloggers like this: