Comments Off on Covid Donald Faking It Until Election Day
The “sudden” onset of Covid (which is a hoax) on TOTUS is again another part of the con game perpetrated on the voters. This administration is on par with a game of “Liars Poker” with the stakes being the health of the voters and the country. There are too many voters who are caught up in the entertainment of this administration while the miscreants in Congress continue to make deals that benefit themselves and their large money donors. The current National leader(?) is self absorbed and ignorant of the duties of the job but continues to bash real information that allows a leader to really lead instead of following flawed or misguided actions. This not a Drill! This the real world where people die based on the actions of their leaders. One can easily espouse ideas and promises but the follow through is more important than the words. This statement by Noted Conservative columnist George Will sums up this administration and it’s titular head: “Presidential Mortification”. The real story here is 3 years of “faking it until you make it” while the country’s voters are at risk economically and in their health. We cannot afford another 4 years of the same at 1600 Fraud avenue or in the Miscreant Congress.
Trump Didn’t Disclose First Positive Covid-19 Test While Awaiting a Second Test on Thursday
An example of Presidential Mortification-no regard for anyone other than himself. MA
Michael C. Bender, Rebecca Ballhaus 11 hrs ago
WASHINGTON—President Trump didn’t disclose a positive result from a rapid test for Covid-19 on Thursday while awaiting the findings from a more thorough coronavirus screening, according to people familiar with the matter.
Mr. Trump received a positive result on Thursday evening before making an appearance on Fox News in which he didn’t reveal those results. Instead, he confirmed earlier reports that one of his top aides had tested positive for coronavirus and mentioned the second test he had taken that night for which he was awaiting results.
“I’ll get my test back either tonight or tomorrow morning,” Mr. Trump said during the interview. At 1 a.m. on Friday, the president tweeted that he indeed had tested positive.
Under White House protocols, the more reliable test that screens a specimen from deeper in the nasal passage is administered only after a rapid test shows a positive reading. Based on people familiar with the matter, the president’s tests followed that protocol.
As the virus spread among the people closest to him, Mr. Trump also asked one adviser not to disclose results of their own positive test. “Don’t tell anyone,” Mr. Trump said, according to a person familiar with the conversation.
Mr. Trump and his top advisers also aimed to keep such a close hold on the early positive results that his campaign manager, Bill Stepien, didn’t know that Hope Hicks, one of the president’s closest White House aides, had tested positive on Thursday morning until news reports later that evening, according to a person familiar with the matter. The Trump campaign said Friday evening that Mr. Stepien had tested positive.
The initial secrecy within Mr. Trump’s inner circle has created a sense of anxiety within the West Wing. Publicly, the White House has issued evolving and contradictory statements about the president’s health that has some officials worried about their own credibility.
“I’m glued to Twitter and TV because I have no official communication from anyone in the West Wing,” an administration official said.
The White House didn’t respond immediately to a request for comment.
The lack of clear communication about who was getting the virus has extended to reports on the president’s status as he undergoes treatment.
At a press briefing Saturday, the president, who has been hospitalized at Walter Reed Medical Center since Friday, watched as the White House physician, Dr. Sean Conley, told reporters that his symptoms were improving. Minutes later, Mr. Trump grew alarmed when another person familiar with the situation warned reporters that Mr. Trump’s recent condition had been concerning. An angry president quickly dialed an adviser from his hospital room.
“Who the f— said that?” Mr. Trump demanded, according to a person familiar with the call. The Associated Press later identified the person as White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.
The president’s doctors said Sunday that his condition was improving and that he could be discharged from the hospital as soon as Monday, but also said he was taking a steroid typically recommended for serious cases.
That fast-moving revelations began Thursday evening when Mr. Trump confirmed on Fox News that one of his closest aides, Hope Hicks, had tested positive that day, and said: “I just heard about this.” CBS News first reported that by that point, Mr. Trump had received his own positive result on a rapid test.
But Ms. Hicks had learned about her own positive test result that morning, and the information was kept to a tight circle of advisers, according to people familiar with the matter. Ms. Hicks’s positive test results were first reported by Bloomberg News later that evening. The White House offered no official statement on Ms. Hope’s positive test.
Mr. Stepien and the rest of the Trump campaign first learned of Ms. Hicks’ positive test from Bloomberg News, and weren’t consulted on whether to proceed with a Thursday trip to New Jersey, a campaign official said.
The White House has said the operations team deemed the trip safe. The president had tested negative on a rapid test that morning, according to a person familiar with the matter. Mr. Meadows has said the White House learned of Ms. Hicks’ results right as Marine One was leaving for New Jersey, and said the administration pulled some advisers off the trip. The president left the White House just after 1 p.m. that day.
The decision not to cancel the New Jersey trip drew swift criticism from health experts. Lisa M. Lee, a public-health expert specializing in infectious-disease epidemiology and public-health ethics at Virginia Tech University, said “holding the [Bedminster] event in spite of knowing that one of the team was infected and had exposed others was a recipe for spreading disease.”
White House officials said their medical team is conducting contact tracing for staff that have tested positive, but uncertainty has also been infused into that process, people familiar with the matter said. Contact tracing is a crucial step, public health experts have said, to stem the spread of infectious disease.
That process is gaining importance since Mr. Trump and his senior advisers spent most of last week following their normal schedule rarely using other tools—safe distance and masks—to keep the virus at bay. In some instances, protocols were followed. At the New Jersey events, attendees had to test negative, complete a wellness questionnaire and pass a temperature screening. Guests were kept 6 feet from the president.
Chris Christie, the former New Jersey governor, said on Friday that he learned about the initial positive tests at the White House on Thursday through news reports. No one had contacted him even though he had spent much of the past week with Mr. Trump.
Mr. Christie tested positive for the virus on Saturday, he said on Twitter, and a few hours later checked himself into Morristown Medical Center.
Mr. Christie was part of a debate preparation team that met with Mr. Trump the morning of Sept. 26, which included Ms. Hicks, former White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, and Mr. Stepien. All four have since tested positive. The White House typically administers a rapid test to anyone who will be close to the president.
Others who participated in the debate practices have reported negative Covid-19 tests, including former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Jason Miller, a senior campaign adviser. Mr. Giuliani said he learned of Ms. Hicks’ positive test from news reports, though he received a call from Mr. Meadows when the president tested positive.
Mr. Christie and Ms. Conway were among hundreds of guests later that afternoon at a White House event where Mr. Trump announced Judge Amy Coney Barrett as his latest Supreme Court nominee. Few of the guests wore masks as they were seated shoulder-to-shoulder in the Rose Garden or congregated inside the White House, where an ad hoc reception line emerged at one point as guests waited to meet Judge Barrett or take pictures together. Several other guests have since tested positive.
Minnesota state Rep. Kurt Daudt said Saturday he was awaiting a Covid-19 test after greeting Mr. Trump at the Minneapolis airport on Wednesday. Mr. Daudt and other greeters had been tested before meeting the president, and were instructed not to shake hands with him or get close to him, but when the president came down the stairs from the plane, he offered to take photos.
“You’ve been tested, right?” Mr. Trump said, according to Mr. Daudt.
Several of the greeters posed for photos with the president, with some standing less than a foot away from him, according to photos from the event. None wore a mask. Mr. Trump then attended a fundraiser at the home of Mike Davis, owners of a quartz countertop company, according to his campaign schedule.
Ms. Hicks had fallen ill by the time Air Force One departed Minneapolis for a campaign rally in Duluth, a person familiar with the matter said. She isolated herself from other aides for the short flight and again on the return flight home to Washington that night.
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany held a news conference with reporters Thursday morning, unaware that her colleague had tested positive earlier that day, a personal familiar with the matter said. She had traveled with Ms. Hicks on Wednesday and Tuesday.
After she finished the briefing, and around 45 minutes before the president left for New Jersey, she was told she was no longer included in White House entourage flying with the president that afternoon to a fundraiser in Bedminster, New Jersey, but not given a reason why, according to the same person. She didn’t learn until later that afternoon that Ms. Hicks had tested positive, the person said.
Write to Michael C. Bender at Mike.Bender@wsj.com and Rebecca Ballhaus at Rebecca.Ballhaus@wsj.com
Apparently the real truth is emerging or perhaps has emerged. The GOP seems to be set on reducing the population of the United States starting with the least of us (lower income and people of color). It should be considered that no one in the administration or Congress have lost a cent of wages during this pandemic while restricting funding for the millions affected by the pandemic. To be clear the funds that keep the Government running is all taxpayers dollars. There is no magic pot of gold sup[plying these funds. The way it works: the individuals, corporations and States pay money to the Federal government in the form of taxes. This money is then allocated to the various departments of the Government to finance the country’s needs (i.e. Military, park service, Congress, justice department etc.). So how is that Congress can dictate the usage while still getting paid and the providers of these funds cannot receive the benefits? There is no better reason for electing to terminate the job of any Congressional member and Executive branch member rather than voting by rote because it’s easier or simpler. As voters we need to abandon being entertained rather than being informed by the people we elect to serve. It is a clear message as to the direction we (voters) need to go when major backers of a party have formed independent groups to place ads against the sitting President and his abettors in Congress. The real power is in the vote by informed voters not in entertainment or single issues.
During this pandemic and now the western fires our Neer do well Congress has been working(?) on relief funding for job losses, healthcare and small business assistance. While millions of American voters are without employment due to business closings and restricted movement, I am wondering why Congress and the administration are still being paid. These idiots are not suffering food scarcity, lack of residency and healthcare but they are toying with the relief that is sorely needed because they are concerned about the deficit. The need now is to preserve the lives and well being of the voters at any cost. Once this pandemic is contained and people go back to work with a place tp live, the deficit will begin to correct. This correction will take years but people will be safe and healthy and therefore able to work and produce (example post WWII). It is a travesty that this Congress and administration are no more than high profile “snake oil salesmen” who if we as voters do not step up will continue their dishonest ways. We (voters) have an opportunity to begin a correction in November. No matter your party , we need to remove the current neer do wells in Congress and the Whitehouse so we can begin the repair process. it is well to remember that we the people are the term limits for Congress and the President. No amount of rhetoric and rally’s can justify keeping these poor performers in office.
Comments Off on Unfortunate Is Not The Correct Word
It is unfortunate that we have an administration whose sole claim to fame is disingenuousness and deceit. The drama that surrounds this administration is palpable yet so many American voters are enthralled with every issuance from the Titular head and the many minions that surround him. Is it possible that the followers are just unaware that most if not all actions from this administration will affect the entire nation now and later? This administration has had a revolving door policy as far as Cabinet members , department heads and even justice department members. This does not make for a cohesive national policy. This is proven by the fact that even now we have no national policy on a pandemic that has ravaged the economy and the health of millions. Now along with that is the idea that the post office is unsafe to use as a conveyance for our mail. It appears that this President first has no idea how to do the job and cannot be “coached” on how to do it. He has hired people who are totally unqualified to do their jobs but have them because they are “loyal” to him. His loyalty to the voters of America does not exist no matter the nattering’s that emerge from TOTUS and his minions. It is unfortunate that so many voters fail to see the failings of this administration and the long range effects it will have on ALL of us. Recently the head of the Justice department (our Attorney General) has taken up a personal case on the President’s behalf and we may be paying for it (kind of like Mexico paying for a wall)
If you are paying attention , really paying attention you may have noticed that each event with TOTUS is a rally with attendees flouting the guidelines for COVID (masks, distancing and possibly hand hygiene). After these rally’s there is an upsurge of Covid cases. TOTUS never mentions these upsurges, is it possible that he place no importance on the health of his “base” or he doesn’t care? After months of an unresolved or properly addressed pandemic and the subsequent economic downturn, the administration has done nothing more than tout “pie in the sky” cures much like the “snake oil salesman” of the early days of our country. It is incredible to me that so many seemingly intelligent people follow this uninformed leader. As an assortment of reports come in from numerous locations across the country especially areas that have suffered unrest, I am at once surprised and appalled at lack of knowledge potential voters have on the issues. I should say these voters seem to have one (1) issue rather than a wide view of all of the issues and how they affect them now and in the future. It seems that many people cannot see the long range effects of poor legislation since they think it can’t hurt them. A little gruesome thought: The followers of Jim Jones possibly thought the same thing when they drank the “koolaid”!
This Presidency has been and is one of the biggest cons to be perpetrated on the voters of this country. This is all being viewed by our allies with incredulity and our enemies with delight yet the voters (TOTUS supporters) can’t see the forest for the trees (which under this administration are in danger). The cure for bad government is an informed electorate and you do not have to be a legal scholar to know what the Constitution provides us as citizens but you do have a mind to recognize truth from fiction or at the least be willing to search for truth.
Comments Off on Christian Group Launches New Effort to Convince Swing-State Believers That Their Faith Should Lead Them to Vote Against Trump
It appears that TOTUS’s Christian Conservatives backers are not as upright as they purport to be, this article shows that the “real” Christians are not as self serving as TOTUS’s backers. MA
Jason Lemon 1 hr ago
Christian Group Launches New Effort to Convince Swing-State Believers That Their Faith Should Lead Them to Vote Against Trump
Faithful America, which describes itself as the largest online community of grassroots Christians acting for social justice, announced the new effort and its largest-ever team expansion with four new organizers hired on Tuesday. In a press release emailed to Newsweek, the organization explained that it plans to “foster at least 11,000 deep, faith-based conversations about the moral values at stake in this election,” with a budget of $65,000.
Reverend Nathan Empsall, Faithful America’s campaigns director, explained in a statement emailed to Newsweek that this is the first time the organization has chosen to become directly involved in election activity.
“Donald Trump is not a normal president, which means that our approach to this election cannot be normal, either. We’re taking this new approach to relational organizing because our faith is deep, and our organizing must be deep too,” Empsall said.
Empsall explained that members of his organization believe Trump and Republicans have “distorted” the Gospel message of Christianity to serve a “hateful, right-wing agenda.” The reverend said the group’s message is that “people of faith can and should vote with love and hope, not hatred and discrimination.”
In Trump’s America, if you’re not a conservative white Christian, you’re not American. https://t.co/UA945hwlRV— Rev. Nathan Empsall (@NathanEmpsall) September 5, 2020
The Christian organizer pointed out that Trump has attacked “the faith of anyone who dares criticize him, claiming that Catholic Joe Biden will ‘hurt God,’ Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith is a ‘crutch,’ and Catholic Nancy Pelosi doesn’t pray. Trump has also opposed the rights and security of Native Americans, Muslims and Jews.”
“This is not religious freedom, or even Christian freedom: It is a form of toxic Christian nationalism,” Empsall said.
Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania are seen as key battlegrounds in the November election. Former Democratic President Barack Obama won all three states in 2008 and 2012 but they flipped red for Trump in 2016. If Democrats managed to maintain all the states former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton won in 2016 and regained these three battleground states, that would push Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden to victory in the Electoral College.
Polling conducted by Pew Research Center in June showed that Christians overall were about evenly split on whether they approve or disapprove of the job Trump has done as president. While 49 percent said they disapproved, another 49 percent said they approved.
But Trump’s support among white evangelical Christians, which has been seen as a key base of support since his election in 2016, remained at 72 percent. Just a quarter (25 percent) of white evangelicals disapproved of the president. However, the poll showed a decline in support from 2016, when 76 percent of white evangelicals said they voted for Trump.
The president has attempted to position himself to Christian voters as a defender of “religious freedom.” But his critics readily point out that he appears to only be concerned about the “religious freedom” of conservative Christians. Trump publicly called for banning Muslims from entering the U.S. during his previous presidential campaign. After taking office, he pushed through a ban on immigrants from multiple Muslim-majority countries—which critics saw as a watered-down version of his proposed Muslim ban.
The president has leaned on the support of evangelical Christian leaders to rally his base of conservative supporters. Prominent evangelical pastor Franklin Graham prayed in support of President Donald Trump at the Republican National Convention in August. The evangelical leader has previously argued that Trump “defends the faith.”
But there has been a growing pushback from a minority of white evangelicals and many other Christians who see Trump and his policies as fundamentally opposed to the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Gospel message. Graham’s niece Jerusha Duford, who now describes herself as a “homeless evangelical,” joined the anti-Trump group The Lincoln Project in August, aiming to convince other evangelicals like herself to vote for Biden over the incumbent Republican president.
“Ultimately, Christians don’t need a candidate who will protect us — we need a candidate who will protect the least of these. If we truly want to be faithful disciples, then we must love our neighbors in everything we do, including voting,” Empsall said. “That means working to reunite families at the border; stopping the virus that kills our neighbors; protecting the climate, health care, and democracy; and standing up to white supremacy.”
A shadow of hunger looms over the United States. In the pandemic economy, nearly one in eight households doesn’t have enough to eat. The lockdown, with its epic lines at food banks, has revealed what was hidden in plain sight: that the struggle to make food last long enough, and to get food that’s healthful — what experts call ‘food insecurity’ — is a persistent one for millions of Americans.
AMERICA AT HUNGER’S EDGE
Photographs by Brenda Ann KenneallySeptember 2, 2020
Beginning in May, Brenda Ann Kenneally set out across the country, from New York to California, to capture the routines of Americans who struggle to feed their families, piecing together various forms of food assistance, community support and ingenuity to make it from one month to the next.
Food insecurity is as much about the threat of deprivation as it is about deprivation itself: A food-insecure life means a life lived in fear of hunger, and the psychological toll that takes. Like many hardships, this burden falls disproportionately on Black and Hispanic families, who are almost twice as likely to experience food insecurity as white families.Troy, N.Y.May 9
Like so many who live at hunger’s edge, the members of the extended Stocklas family — whom Kenneally has photographed for years — gain and lose food stamps depending on fluctuating employment status in an unstable economy. They often have trouble stretching their funds to the end of the month, so they pool resources to provide family-style dinners for all.Tap to cycle through images
When Kandice Zakrzewski, 25, was no longer eligible for food stamps, she stopped buying Lactaid for her son, Matthew Ratleph, 2. “We had to give that up for him. And just say ‘You can’t drink milk.’ Or we have to water it down.”
Just days before Kenneally arrived, the governor closed schools statewide, creating a new source of stress for food-insecure families, which often rely on free school lunches to keep their school-age children fed. This made the family’s big collective meals all the more crucial. “Even if it’s just pitching in $10 when we don’t have food stamps,” Kandice Zakrzewski says, “we all pitch in.”Zakrzewski’s son Brayden Ratleph, 6.Kayla Stocklas. “We just kind of get our food and just all do our own thing,” Zakrzewski says.Gary, Ind.June 6
Late last year, Doris Hall, 63, moved back to Gary, her hometown, to look after her great-grandchildren — “so they don’t have to be in daycare,” she says. On weekends, she takes in as many as nine of the children — occasionally all 14 — so that their parents can work.Tap to cycle through images
Hall’s rules are strict: naptime in the afternoon, bedtime at 9 p.m. and most important, whatever she cooks, they must eat.
For lunch, it’s “microwaveable stuff,” like corndogs, hot dogs and chicken nuggets that Hall picks up at the nearby food bank. Dinners vary: spaghetti, chicken, soups, tacos. When she has a rare moment to eat alone, she makes her favorite meal for herself: greens and tacos.Some of Hall’s great-grandchildren waiting for lunch.Armani and Kimani Lacy, 5. “I never liked cooking,” Hall says, “but now that I’ve been taking care of the grandkids, I stay in the kitchen.”
In the face of deprivation, food-insecure families often seize any opportunity to get and store food when it’s available.In the middle of a food desert in Jackson, Miss., a family’s freezer holds as much as it can.Freezing milk in Erie, Pa., so nothing goes to waste.In Tucson, Ariz., a “cheap soup” made on the stovetop.In Gary, Ind., assembling a full meal from individual school-lunch portions of taco meat.Stockpiling supplies in Jackson, Miss.School lunches, and the single-serving milk cartons they often contain, are a mainstay for food-insecure households, like this one in Gary, Ind.
Kenneally arrived in Illinois in early June, soon after nationwide unemployment claims filed during the pandemic had topped 40 million.Cicero, Ill.June 8
In Cicero, just west of Chicago, Jennifer Villa, 29, was living in an apartment with a kitchen that needed plumbing repairs. She and her family were already struggling — a disability makes it hard for her to work — and the pandemic had meant less fresh food and even longer pantry lines.Tap to cycle through images
Temporarily without a working kitchen, Villa organized the food she received from food pantries in the alleyway outside her home.
Whenever food deliveries came, Villa’s kids would celebrate. “Oh, Mommy, we’re going to have food tonight,” they would tell her. “We’re not going to go to sleep with no food in our tummy.”Armani RodriguezSonia RodriguezSt. LouisJune 12
By June, the social upheavals following the killing of George Floyd created even more instability for some families. Kenneally visited Manausha Russ, 28, a few days after protests led to the closure of a nearby Family Dollar, where Russ used to get basics like milk, cereal and diapers. “The stores by my house were all looted,” she says.Tap to cycle through images
From left, Aliza, 1, Nyla, 6, Amarri, 5, and Kadynce, 8, with their mother, Manausha Russ.
Russ lives with her four daughters on the west side of St. Louis. She receives about $635 per month in food stamps, but with the girls at home all day, and her partner, Lamarr, there too, it isn’t always sufficient. “Some days I feel like I have a lot,” she says, “and some days I feel like I don’t have enough.”The family moved into their current apartment about six months ago.Russ doesn’t have a dining table or chairs yet, so the girls eat on the floor.MemphisJune 19
In so many places, Kenneally found food-insecure families were helping one another out despite their own hardship. Here, in a condominium complex on the city’s east side, a neighbor picked up free school lunches and distributed them to children in the building, including the Boughton sisters: Brooklyn, 4, on the far right, Chynna, 9, and Katie, 8, seen here with a neighbor’s toddler who has since moved away.
Most of the families Kenneally photographed had struggled to feed themselves adequately for years. But she also met families who had been thrown into food insecurity by the pandemic.
FACING HUNGER FOR THE FIRST TIMEText by Tim ArangoIn the Horsburgh household, trips to pick up donated food — a service the family had not needed for years, before Covid-19 — became a diversion for the children stuck at home.Claire Hudson with her son. Hudson has begun bringing food to the homeless in Erie, Pa.
The federal government’s food-stamp program has been dramatically expanded to confront the economic devastation of the pandemic. But even that hasn’t been enough, as the ranks of the needy grow.Ciara Young (right) and family, Memphis. Young lost her job in the pandemic.
In long conversations around the country this August — at kitchen tables, in living rooms and sitting in cars in slow-moving food lines with rambunctious children in the back — Americans reflected on their new reality. The shame and embarrassment. The loss of choice in something as basic as what to eat. The worry over how to make sure their children get a healthy diet. The fear that their lives will never get back on track.Alexis Cazimero now drives around San Diego County with her younger children, seen here, distributing food to families like hers.
“Folks who had really good jobs and were able to pay their bills and never knew how to find us,” says Ephie Johnson, the president and chief executive of Neighborhood Christian Charities. “A lot of people had finally landed that job, were helping their family, and able to do a little better. And then this takes you out.”Read the Full EssayMinivans at the Food Pantry: Meet America’s New Needy by Tim ArangoClara McMillin, 4, is just one of many American children whose families didn’t face food insecurity until the pandemic set in.
By late June, Kenneally had reached Mississippi, where the economic toll of Covid-19 was falling hard on some of America’s most chronically impoverished areas, where residents have lived under hunger’s shadow for years. The pandemic dropped the state’s labor participation rate to just 53 percent, the lowest in the nation.Patricia Luckett, 57, has no car, so she sometimes takes a 30-minute walk to get food from a local social services organization in Jackson, Miss.Luckett at home. “I’m a country girl,” she says. “I love to cook.”Karen Cotton, 40, and her sons Jayden Brooks (left), 8, and Adrian Brooks, 11, in Jackson, Miss.Adrian holds one of his favorite snacks. “It’s not filled with sugar, so I buy them in bulk,” Cotton says. “This is what I call a healthy snack.”Deborah Sulton, 66, who has lived in Jackson all her life, has 25 grandchildren and 13 great-grandchildren.“The way I feed is, I cook like a cook for an army,” Sulton says.Aydin Sulton, 2, one of the many relatives Sulton helps support with her Social Security income and food stamps.“I have fed a lot of people and a lot of kids in the community,” Sulton says. “Whatever I got, I will share it because I get my blessings back in return.”
Even before the pandemic, more than half of Mississippi’s seniors — 56 percent — experienced regular shortfalls in food. One in 4 Mississippians is now experiencing food insecurity, according to the nonprofit Feeding America.The kitchen of Helen O’Bryant and her daughter, Nita, in Greenwood, Miss.“We’re learning to enjoy life a little better,” says Helen, 72, sitting beside Nita, 45. “Cooking helps, it really does. It’s something I want to do for my daughter.”Thaddeus Whitehead, 41, with his children Angel, 7, and D’angelo, 8, in Greenwood, Miss.Whitehead says he spends about $150 on groceries every two weeks, plus he gets boxes of food from a nearby church.He also catches bream from a local lake. “I cook about 10, and I put the rest of them up in the freezer. Then when we need to eat them, I defrost them.”Jackson, Miss.June 30
The city of Jackson (population 164,000) is often classified as a “food desert” for its high rate of food insecurity and the scarcity of well-stocked stores. Deidre Lyons lives there with her three kids, sister, niece and father. Lyons, 28, receives $524 a month in food stamps, but without access to a car, she can’t easily get to a grocery store to use them.Tap to cycle through images
Lyons’s daughter Tianna, 1.
“My kids, they love to eat,” says Lyons, whose cousin will occasionally drive her to the grocery store when she isn’t caring for her own children. “My kids eat whatever we cook because they aren’t picky eaters. I’m hoping they stay like that.”Janiya in late June outside Robinson Food Mart.Jaheim buying a corndog at the Dude With the Food, a convenience store within walking distance of home.
The causes of chronic food insecurity are many: unemployment; low wages; unaffordable or unstable housing; rising medical costs; unreliable transportation.
HOW HUNGER PERSISTS IN AMERICAText by Adrian Nicole LeBlancAt a homeless shelter in Menands, N.Y., in early spring.
Treating hunger as a temporary emergency, instead of a symptom of systemic problems, has always informed the American response to it — and as a result government programs have been designed to alleviate each peak, rather than address the factors that produce them.A resident at a low-income apartment building in Utica, N.Y., takes a meal to a friend.Receiving lunches provided by the Y.M.C.A. in Memphis, delivered by a neighbor.
Food banks are supposed to fill in the gaps, but more than 37 million Americans are food insecure, according to the U.S.D.A. “We call it an emergency food system, but it’s a 50-year emergency,” says Noreen Springstead, executive director of WhyHunger, which supports grass-roots food organizations.Read the Full EssayHow Hunger Persists in a Rich Country Like America by Adrian Nicole LeBlancMartha Carrizales, 59, has worked in a school cafeteria for 18 years. When the pandemic led to school closures, she was hired to spend a few hours a day preparing and handing out food to neighborhood residents.
In early July, the pandemic was cresting in Texas just as Kenneally arrived.HoustonJuly 6
Kelly Rivera, a single mother with three kids who makes $688 every two weeks as a teacher’s aide, goes to the food bank on Wednesdays to supplement what she is able to buy with food stamps. “There are times they give you what you need, and there are times they don’t give you what you need,” she says. “You can’t be picky.”Tap to cycle through images
Rivera’s children eat Cheetos on the couch after returning home from picking up groceries. (From left: Destiny, 4, Ana, 6, Jonathan, 3.)
The family had to wait for hours at the Catholic Charities in 100-degree heat. But Rivera has a message for her struggling neighbors who are too proud to visit food banks: “Don’t be ashamed. That is what the community is there for, to help.”Rivera waiting in a long food line.Ana, left, and Destiny sit in their car, waiting in a parking lot to be allowed into the actual food line, where they will wait even longer.Hatch, N.M.July 13
Some 800 miles west in New Mexico, near the town of Hatch, workers pick onions for $15 a box, which translates to less than a minimum wage for many workers. There are no food pantries nearby, and so the workers are forced to eat extremely simply on their earnings, making nearly everything they eat from scratch.Tap to cycle through images
At the beginning of the onion season, a priest came to the field at dawn to bless the harvest.
Juan Pablo Reyes is using the money he made picking onions to help pay for college. “People that work at the bottom of the food chain, cultivating all these different crops, are basically the builders of our country,” he says.Yasmin and Yeslin Reyes, 11, are the only members of their family who don’t work in the onion fields, but that will change next summer.Their older brothers started when they turned 12, and the same is expected of them.Juan Pablo’s high school graduation cap says “Proud Immigrant” and has flowers in the colors of the Mexican flag.
Leaving New Mexico, Kenneally headed west across Arizona. She finished her journey in Southern California at the end of July. The story there was no different than it had been across the country, except that wildfires were also beginning to ravage the state — yet another crisis in a year full of them.San DiegoJuly 31
An event planner and hairstylist who has been out of work since early in the pandemic, Alexis Frost Cazimero, 40, now spends her days driving around the county with three of her children — Mason, 6 (not pictured); Carson, 5; and Coco, 1 — collecting food for her family and for neighbors and friends who are unable to leave their homes or reluctant to seek help.
Cazimero says she is grateful she has been able to help others. “Being that person in the community that shares and brings resources to the people that can’t get them brings purpose to my family.”Adam Cazimero, 40, Coco (standing), Mason and Carson.
Kenneally’s photographs reveal the fragility of American life, exposed and exacerbated by the pandemic. They show us how close to the edge so many families live, how vulnerable and insecure their arrangements are, and also how resilient they can be when faced with a crisis.
But nothing stands out from these images more vividly than the children: eating whatever they can, whenever and wherever they can, somehow managing to maintain, in the midst of this historically desperate time, some innocence and some hope.Hatch, N.M.Gary, Ind.Parma, OhioHouston
They are the greatest victims of the food-insecurity crisis. Research has shown long-term links between food insecurity and a wide variety of health issues in children — elevated risks of asthma and other chronic illnesses, lags in educational attainment. And according to a Brookings Institution researcher, the number of U.S. children in need of immediate food assistance is approximately 14 million.Oneida, N.Y.East Chicago, Ind.Florissant, Mo.
For most of these children, the pandemic did not cause the instability that plagues their lives; when it is over, they will face a crisis no less acute, one that has persisted in this country for generations.Florissant, Mo.HoustonHatch, N.M.
In the richest nation on earth, they live at the edge of hunger.
Kenneally visited many food distribution sites along her journey, including ones run by: the Salvation Army, Catholic Charities, Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Pennsylvania, Parma City School District, St. Louis Area Foodbank, Operation Food Search, Neighborhood Christian Centers, Y.M.C.A. of Memphis and the Mid-South and Stewpot Community Services.
Brenda Ann Kenneally is a multimedia journalist who, over 30 years, has produced participatory media projects with families from her home community, including “Upstate Girls: Unraveling Collar City.” She is currently assembling a multimedia autobiography, charting her experience from being a disenfranchised youth to becoming a Guggenheim fellow and frequent contributor to the magazine. Read more about Kenneally’s journey.
Adrian Nicole LeBlanc, an independent journalist and MacArthur fellow, was embedded in an assisted-living facility as Kenneally began her trip for this issue. They have worked together since 2003.
Tim Arango is a Los Angeles-based national correspondent for The Times. He spent seven years as Baghdad bureau chief and also covered Turkey. Before heading overseas, he had been a media reporter for The Times since 2007.
Additional Reporting by Maddy Crowell, Lovia Gyarkye, Concepción de León, Jaime Lowe, Jake Nevins, Kevin Pang and Malia Wollan.
Photo Editors: Amy Kellner and Rory Walsh.
Design by Aliza Aufrichtig and Eden Weingart.READ 622 COMMENTS
Comments Off on We Have The Power and We Do Not Use It.
I have been wondering why the US Congress (the people we elected to represent us) are COLA recipients while we the people who exist on Social security and Medicaid, SSI or some other Government retirement receive little to no increases? The reality is that no matter what the electeds tell us, they take care of themselves and lie to us. Our Taxes pay their salaries (which are too high) and thereby pay for their healthcare and retirement. I have heard folks say there should be term limits, in theory that is fine however we cannot expect these folks to limit themselves to a 2 or 4 years term and stop. We the people are the term limits and we do that by voting for or against. This election season is the opportunity to make adjustments. Another 4 years of TOTUS and his miscreants will prove to be more deadly than it is right now. Remember he is being abetted by the same neer do well Congress we have kept in office for too long. This requires informed voting based on several issues not just your favorite.
In the recent RNC convention, I have noticed that in the remarks, many members of the White House staff and some party members have stated that they get tested daily. If this is indeed the case, then why is it that we do not have national testing yet? These statements are either lies or political rhetoric. Why would “our leaders” withhold testing from the citizenry? This question should puzzle all of us. Why is Dr. Fauci left out of conversations while the CDC issues false information and then is forced to retract it? We already know that the administration has no ability to tell the truth, yet why would testing be withheld from the public as this would be boost for them in this election season? This could be a conundrum if they were honest people however their track record for the truth is full of ruts and potholes. These questions and statements could apply to any political party but it applies to the one currently in control of the White House. It is a long standing sense from many voters that politicians are not trustworthy but we pay attention to what they say and do. If you remove party from politics, you have individuals with their personal faults which influence their actions on their behalf not ours (the people who elected them). It is odd that we (voters) to our detriment have become inured to the ramblings of our elected officials, shouldn’t we take the rose colored glasses off and take a serious look at who we are voting for?
You must be logged in to post a comment.